Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Black v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.
Black v. E. Pa. Rys. Co., 257 PA 273 (Pa. 1917)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1917-03-19
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
Per Curiam, The Act of 1895 clearly barred the right of either of the plaintiffs to recover in this action, brought more than five years after the injuries to the wife were sustained, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below refusing to take off the nonsuit. Judgment affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Black v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
The Act of 1895 clearly barred the right of either of the plaintiffs to recover in this action, brought more than five years after the injuries to the wife were sustained, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below refusing to take off the nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.