Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CLAYTON v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY, 10 N.J. 314 (1952)

NETTIE CLAYTON & BERT CLAYTON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JERSEY CENTRALPOWER LIGHT Co., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER., 91 A.2d 230 (N.J. 1952)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1952-09-08
Topic: general

CLAYTON v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY, 10 N.J. 314 (1952) 91 A.2d 230 NETTIE CLAYTON AND BERT CLAYTON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JERSEY CENTRALPOWER LIGHT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 8, 1952. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CLAYTON v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY, 10 N.J. 314 (1952). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CLAYTON v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY,10 N.J. 314(1952)

91 A.2d 230

NETTIE CLAYTON AND BERT CLAYTON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JERSEY CENTRAL

POWER LIGHT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

September 8, 1952.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Vincent P. KeuperandMr. Harry Greenfor the petitioner.Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona Combsfor the respondents.

See same case below:19 N.J. Super. 546.

Denied.Page 315