Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, 266 Conn. 927 (2003)

835 A.2d 474

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2003-11-12
Topic: general

BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, 266 Conn. 927 (2003) 835 A.2d 474 BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF MANCHESTERSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 626 (AC 23313), is denied. PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, 266 Conn. 927 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,266 Conn. 927(2003)

835 A.2d 474

BALF COMPANY v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF MANCHESTER

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,79 Conn. App. 626(AC 23313), is denied.

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.John F. Sullivan, in support of the petition.Jared Cohane, in opposition.

Decided November 12, 2003