Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
In re the Grant of the Charter School Application of Greater Brunswick Charter School
In re Grant of the Charter Sch. Application of Greater Brunswick Charter Sch., 164 N.J. 314 (N.J. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 2000-06-28
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 320 N.J.Super. 174, 727 A.2d 15 (1999), except to the extent that it is modified by our decision in the companion appeal of In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of Englewood on the Palisades Charter School, In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of the Classical Academy Charter School of Clifton, Passaic County, In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of the Franklin Charter School, Somerset County, 164 N.J. 316, 753 A.2d 687 (2000), also decided today. For affirmance as modified — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, LaVECCHIA, HAVEY and CARCHMAN — 7. Opposed — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re the Grant of the Charter School Application of Greater Brunswick Charter School. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
We affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 320 N.J.Super. 174, 727 A.2d 15 (1999), except to the extent that it is modified by our decision in the companion appeal of In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of Englewood on the Palisades Charter School, In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of the Classical Academy Charter School of Clifton, Passaic County, In the Matter of the Grant of the Charter School Application of the Franklin Charter School, Somerset County, 164 N.J. 316, 753 A.2d 687 (2000), also decided today.
For affirmance as modified — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, LaVECCHIA, HAVEY and CARCHMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.