Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Carlin v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
363 Pa. 543
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1950-01-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "The cause of action owned by the plaintiff is distinct from the cause of action arising out of the duty of the additional defendant to indemnify the defendant."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carlin v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 19 opinions
363 Pa. 543 (1950)
Carlin
Carlin
v.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, Appellant, et al.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued November 21, 1949. January 3, 1950.Before MAXEY, C.J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES, JJ.
*546 Ralph M. Barley, with him Paul A. Mueller, for appellant.
F. Lyman Windolph, with him Windolph & Johnstone, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, January 3, 1950:
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.