Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

David v. Metro. Life Ins., 136 N.J.L. 195 (N.J. 1947)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1947-09-12
Topic
general

*196 Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
*196 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.