Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. PALMER, 51 N.J. 190 (1968)

CITY OF E. ORANGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DWIGHT R.G. PALMER,COMMISSIONER, ETC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS., 238 A.2d 475 (N.J. 1968)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1968-02-13
Topic: general

CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. PALMER, 51 N.J. 190 (1968) 238 A.2d 475 CITY OF EAST ORANGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DWIGHT R.G. PALMER,COMMISSIONER, ETC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 13, 1968.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. PALMER, 51 N.J. 190 (1968). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. PALMER,51 N.J. 190(1968)

238 A.2d 475

CITY OF EAST ORANGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DWIGHT R.G. PALMER,

COMMISSIONER,ETC., ET ALS.,DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 13, 1968.

On petition for certification to Appellate Division, Superior Court.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Mr. Alan B. Handler, Mr. David A.Biederman, Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell FoleyandMissSonia Napolitanofor the petitioners.Mr. Jack OkinandMr. Norman E. Scullfor the respondents.

Granted.