Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

FEORANZO v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., 46 N.J. 605 (1966)

MATTY FEORANZO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. Cont’l CAN CO., ET ALS.,RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS., 218 A.2d 644 (N.J. 1966)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1966-04-04
Topic: general

FEORANZO v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., 46 N.J. 605 (1966) 218 A.2d 644 MATTY FEORANZO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., ET ALS.,RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 4, 1966. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FEORANZO v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., 46 N.J. 605 (1966). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FEORANZO v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO.,46 N.J. 605(1966)

218 A.2d 644

MATTY FEORANZO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO.,ET ALS.,

RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

April 4, 1966.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. John W. Taylorfor the petitioners.Messrs. Parisi, Evers GreenfieldandMr. Aaron Gordonfor the respondent.

Granted.