Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

BLAU v. BLAU, 418 Pa. 622 (1965)

210 A.2d 168

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
1965-05-25
Topic
general

BLAU v. BLAU, 418 Pa. 622 (1965) 210 A.2d 168 Blau, Appellant, v. Blau.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.April 28, 1965. May 25, 1965. Argued April 28, 1965.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BLAU v. BLAU, 418 Pa. 622 (1965). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BLAU v. BLAU,418 Pa. 622(1965)
210 A.2d 168
Blau, Appellant, v. Blau.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 28, 1965.
May 25, 1965.
Argued April 28, 1965. Before BELL, C. J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.
Appeal, No. 170, Jan. T., 1965, from decree of Court of Common Pleas No. 6 of Philadelphia County, March T., 1961, No. 205, in case of Milton A. Blau, also known as Milton Blau, v. Reba Blau, and Susan Blau, also known as Susan Beverly Blau. Decree affirmed.

Equity. Before DOTY, J.

Decree nisi entered finding for defendant, except that defendant is required to account for certain household furniture; plaintiff's exceptions dismissed and decree entered. Plaintiff appealed.
David Kanner, with himKanner, Stein and Feinberg, for appellant.Page 623Jay H. Rosenfeld, with himRosenfeld Weinrott, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 25, 1965:
Decree affirmed. Costs on appellant.