Clear

2860 search results for query


Citation: 259 F. Supp. 2d 664 | Docket No.: C-2-02-625
Status: Published | Citing: 36
Summary: 259 F. Supp. Jones v. City of Lakeland, 175 F.3d 410, 413 (6th Cir.1999); Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Autk, 895 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990). Co. v. United States, 922 F.2d 320, 325 (6th Cir.1990). Ranch v. Day & Night Mfg. Corp., 576 F.2d 697 (6th Cir.1978). Weiner v. Klais & Co., Inc., 108 F.3d 86, 88 (6th Cir.1997). Morgan v. Church's Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10 (6th Cir.1987). 2d 152 (1991); McCall v. Scott, 239 F.3d 808, 815 (6th Cir.2001). See Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 7......read more.


Citation: 430 F. Supp. 2d 702 | Docket No.: 2:04-cv-1156
Status: Published | Citing: 21
Summary: 430 F. Supp. Jeffrey Hill, a state prisoner sentenced to death by the State of Ohio, is a plaintiff in a civil rights action pending before this Court that challenges multiple facets of the lethal injection protocol used by the State of Ohio. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Hill's emergency motion for a preliminary injunction, i.e., a stay of execution. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341, 348 (6th Cir.1998) (......read more.


Citation: 141 F. Supp. 2d 894 | Docket No.: C-1-89-105, C-1-90-111
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: 141 F. Supp. This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion to Approve Class Action Settlement, (doc. Also before the Court is one filed Objection to the proposed settlement (doc. I. BACKGROUND A. History of the Litigation The facts of this case are set forth in Brotherton v. Cleveland, 173 F.3d 552, 555-57 (6th Cir.1999). ... (B) A county coroner who performs an autopsy pursuant to section 313.13 of the Revised Code may remove one or both corneas of the decedent, or a coroner may ......read more.


Citation: 318 F. Supp. 1189 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 67-320
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 318 F. Supp. 1189 (1970) Robert J. BRADEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, v. John F. BONISTALL, Third-Party Defendant. This case against Robert J. Braden and John F. Bonistall pertains to the personal liability of a corporate officer for the corporation's failure to pay federal taxes withheld from its employees for income taxes and Social Security taxes. On May 7, 1962, Braden hired John F. Bonistall as president and general manager of American Pottery Company. Botta v. Scanl......read more.


Citation: 500 F. Supp. 2d 736 | Docket No.: C-1-05-322
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: 500 F. Supp. The matter is also before the Court upon defendants' motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Suzanne Parisian (doe. At all material times, defendants negligently and/or intentionally designed, developed, tested and manufactured Crestor, an unreasonably dangerous and defective product; they packaged, labeled, promoted, marketed, advertised, sold, and/or distributed Crestor, utilizing information known to fraudulently represent the safety and efficacy of Crestor, and using infor......read more.


Citation: 588 F. Supp. 650 | Docket No.: C-1-83-1201
Status: Published | Cited By: 1 Primary Sources | Citing: 9
Summary: 588 F. Supp. F. Thomas Green, Dayton, Ohio, for Allen-Bradley Co. *651 OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION IN LIMINE SPIEGEL, District Judge: This matter came on for consideration of the motion in limine of plaintiff, Robert C. Nieman (doc. AMF, Inc. v. Computer Automation, Inc., 532 F. Supp. 1335, 1347 n. 19 (S.D.Ohio 1982); Michell v. General Motors, 439 F. Supp. Lake v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 538 F. Supp.


Citation: 163 F. Supp. 2d 876 | Docket No.: C-3-99-383
Status: Published | Citing: 31
Summary: 163 F. Supp. I. Factual Background[2] In 1997, Plaintiff Steven Coleman was under the supervision of Defendant Wanda Deardurff, a parole officer with the Ohio Adult Parole Authority ("OAPA"). Thereafter, on September 22, 1997, Deardurff dictated a report, recommending Coleman's return to the State of Texas for a final parole revocation hearing. See also Boretti v. Wiscomb, 930 F.2d 1150, 1156 (6th Cir. 1991) (The moving party has the "burden of showing that the pleadings, depositions, answers to......read more.


Citation: 832 F. Supp. 209 | Docket No.: C2-91-157
Status: Published | Citing: 25
Summary: 832 F. Supp. The federal Defendants also contend that the Plaintiffs have no private right of action under either the United States Housing Act of 1949 (hereinafter "USHA") or the Fair Housing Act, if sovereign immunity has been waived. The Court first notes the rationale expressed by Judge Whipple of the Western District of Missouri in the case of Tinsley v. Kemp, 750 F. Supp. Almonte v. Pierce, 666 F. Supp. Pursuant to the APA, the FmHA's administration of the Rural Rental Housing Program may ......read more.


Citation: 556 F. Supp. 2d 804 | Docket No.: Case No. C2-06-971
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: (2008) Amina O. ABDI, Plaintiff, v. James KARNES, Defendant. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. As discussed below, this Court must review the evidence in this case in a light favorable to the Plaintiff to determine whether the Defendant is entitled to summary judgment, also meaning the Plaintiff is not entitled to a trial. [1] This case involves an encounter between deputies of the Franklin County Sheriffs Office and Nasir A......read more.


Citation: 72 F. Supp. 2d 874 | Docket No.: C-1-98-772
Status: Published | Citing: 21
Summary: 72 F. Supp. 2d 874 (1999) Lisa McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. PRINCETON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. 10); Defendants Princeton City School District Board of Education and David D. Baker's Response to Plaintiff's Motion (doc. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lisa McDaniel filed this action pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 13, 1998, alleging violations of her right to procedural due process as guaranteed by the United States Constitution, Ohio Rev.Code § 3319.16, and a co......read more.


Citation: 827 F. Supp. 463 | Docket No.: C2-92-877
Status: Published | Citing: 8
Summary: 827 F. Supp. Based upon the allegations of its complaint and the absence of any factual dispute, Dominion has moved the Court for summary judgment arguing that the general rule set forth in O.R.C. § 1304.13 establishes Household's liability to Dominion for the amount paid to Household on the two checks forged by Grossman. Household opposes Dominion's motion and moves for summary judgment in its own right arguing for the application of the impostor exception of O.R.C. § 1303.41 (U.C.C. 3-405), wh......read more.


Citation: 347 F. Supp. 2d 538 | Docket No.: 2:03-MD-1565, 3:03 CV 467-J-25-TEM, 3:03 CV 656-J-25-TEM
Status: Published | Citing: 3
Summary: 347 F. Supp. FINANCIAL INVESTMENT LITIGATION Michael Mahoney, Louis Jahssen and Larry R. White on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. John F. Andrews, et al Defendants. John P. Houlihan, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John F. Andrews Defendants. This matter is before the Magistrate Judge on Plaintiffs' August 26, 2004 motion for leave of court to issue document preservation subpoena to non-party Med Diversified, Inc. (do......read more.


Citation: 895 F. Supp. 907 | Docket No.: C-1-91-011
Status: Published | Citing: 31
Summary: 895 F. Supp. Hill v. Marshall, 962 F.2d 1209, 1213 (6th Cir.1992) (citing Morelock v. NCR Corp., 586 F.2d 1096, 1104 (6th Cir.1978), cert. Morelock, 586 F.2d at 1104. "Thompson v. County of Medina, Ohio, 29 F.3d 238, 242 (6th Cir.1994) (citing Marsh v. Arn, 937 F.2d 1056, 1062 n. 5 (6th Cir.1991)). Agg v. Flanagan, 855 F.2d 336, 341 (6th Cir.1988) (citing Hooks v. Hooks, 771 F.2d 935, 943-44 (6th Cir.1985)). Johnson v. Hills & Dales General Hosp., 40 F.3d 837, 839 (6th Cir.1994).A trial court ma......read more.


Citation: 550 F. Supp. 843 | Docket No.: C-3-82-376
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 550 F. Supp. The question whether the surrender of a prisoner of one sovereign to another sovereign — state or federal — is a "question of State law ...." Helm v. Jago, 588 F.2d 1180, 1181 (6th Cir.1979). Whatever may be the law in other states, see e.g., Thompson v. Bannan, 298 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1962), it is absolutely clear, under Ohio law, which this Court is bound to follow, see Helm v. Jago, supra, 588 F.2d at 1181, that the detainer filed by Respondent to reclaim Petitioner upon his releas......read more.


Citation: 396 F. Supp. 762 | Docket No.: Civ. No. 4455
Status: Published | Citing: 23
Summary: 396 F. Supp. See Reliance Steel Products Co. v. United States, 150 F. Supp. See also, Allied Van Lines v. United States, 303 F. Supp. This and other basic facts about the right to oral hearing were pointed out by the Court in Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United States, 346 F. Supp. [citations omitted] Members of this court have previously stated the role of Commission order review in the case of Carl Subler Trucking, Inc. v. United States, 313 F. Supp.


Citation: 329 F. Supp. 1251 | Docket No.: Crim. No. 9473
Status: Published | Citing: 6
Summary: 329 F. Supp. This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss for the reasons that (1) Section 610 of Title 18, United States Code, upon which the prosecution is predicated, violates the provisions of the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, (2) Section 610 does not provide a penalty applicable to the defendant and (3) the indictment does not allege all the essential and material elements of an offense. Each count charges the defendant, a national ......read more.


Citation: 495 F. Supp. 2d 816 | Docket No.: 3:99cv612
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 495 F. Supp. DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (DOC. The Plaintiff, a radiologist, brings this litigation to obtain compensation for the injuries he alleges that he suffered as a result of the decision of Defendant Mercy Health Systems-Western Ohio ("Mercy Health Systems") to enter into an exclusive contract with Dr. Robin E. Osborn ("Osborn") and his medical corporation, Diagnostic Imaging A......read more.


Citation: 795 F. Supp. 228 | Docket No.: C-1-90-291
Status: Published | Citing: 36
Summary: 795 F. Supp. FACTS The case before the Court involves a teacher who alleges that the School Board and administration did not renew her contract based upon sex discrimination. The defendants are the Hillsboro City School District Board of Education ("Hillsboro" or "Hillsboro Board of Education"), Superintendent John Burton, and head teacher Joseph Temple, Jr. Hillsboro, nevertheless, continued to renew Ms. Cameron's teaching contract until the end of the 1988-89 school year. After she had receive......read more.


Citation: 689 F. Supp. 2d 992 | Docket No.: Case No. 2:10-cv-95
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 689 F. Supp. Because the Court finds that the required disclosure of paid circulators under Ohio Revised Code § 3517.12(B) is unconstitutional under Supreme Court precedent, the Court hereby GRANTS a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from enforcing such provision.


Citation: 398 F. Supp. 683 | Docket No.: 8427, 8440
Status: Published | Citing: 5
Summary: 398 F. Supp. Otto F. Putnick, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff Allen Williams, Jr.