1385 search results for query

Citation: 537 F. Supp. 2d 974 | Docket No.: 1:06-CV-0452-DFH-WTL
Status: Published | Citing: 45
Summary: 537 F. Supp. 2d 974 (2008) Richard MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. INDIANA STATE POLICE, Dean Wildauer, and Other Unknown State Police Troopers, Defendants. ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID F. HAMILTON, Chief Judge. This case presents some interesting questions that arose when Indiana law enforcement authorities transferred to federal authorities the property (cash) that they had seized under the authority of an Indiana state court's search warrant without obtaining the state court's more.

Citation: 688 F. Supp. 462 | Docket No.: IP 87-1086-C
Status: Published | Citing: 32
Summary: 688 F. Supp. Plaintiff, Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 20 ("Local 20"), entered into a collective bargaining agreement (the "Agreement") with defendant, Baylor Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. ("Baylor"). On March 6, 1987, Local 20 filed an unfair labor practice charge against Baylor with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"). Shortly after the expiration of the Agreement, Local 20, pursuant to the interest arbitration clause, submitted to the National Joint Adjustment Board ("NJAB" more.

Citation: 874 F. Supp. 904 | Docket No.: MDL Docket No. 912. IP-90-1679-C
Status: Published | Citing: 24
Summary: 874 F. Supp. Entry Granting in Part and Denying in Part Genentech's Motion for Leave to Further Amend Its Amended Complaint; Granting in Part and Denying in Part UC's Motion to Dismiss Counts II-VIII of Genentech's Amended Complaint; and Reinstating Genentech's § 1 Sherman Act Claim Against Lilly This cause comes before the Court on Genentech's motion for leave further to amend *907 its Amended Complaint and on UC's motion to dismiss counts II-VIII of Genentech's Amended Complaint. For the more.

Citation: 720 F. Supp. 1363 | Docket No.: IP 84-259-C
Status: Published | Citing: 30
Summary: 720 F. Supp. 1363 (1989) BI-RITE OIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. INDIANA FARM BUREAU COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., Decatur County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc., and Noble-Whitley Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc., Defendants. The defendants, Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc. ("IFB"), Noble-Whitley Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc. ("Noble-Whitley") and Decatur County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc. ("Decatur"), each filed a motion for more.

Citation: 313 F. Supp. 1330 | Docket No.: EV 70-Cr-14
Status: Published | Citing: 18
Summary: 313 F. Supp. The defendant moves to dismiss a one count indictment returned by the Grand Jury and filed with the Clerk on May 1, 1970 which charged: "That from on or about January 23, 1970 to on or about March 13, 1970, in the Southern District of Indiana, GILBERT LEE GROSS willfully and knowingly engaged in the business of dealing in firearms in Evansville, Indiana, without having been licensed to do so under the provisions of Chapter 44, Title 18, United States Code; in violation of Title 18, more.

Citation: 463 F. Supp. 2d 891 | Docket No.: 1:05-cv-0311-LJM-WTL
Status: Published | Citing: 59
Summary: 463 F. Supp. Bonnie L. Martin, Kim F. Ebert, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant. Plaintiff, Monica Schmutte ("Schmutte"), alleges that RCI, her former employer, violated her substantive rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ("FMLA"), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and retaliated against her for taking protected FMLA leave. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The following facts are either undisputed or reflect the evidence in light most favorable more.

Citation: 819 F. Supp. 2d 852 | Docket No.: 1:09-cv-1540-SEB-MJD
Status: Published | Citing: 27
Summary: 819 F. Supp. 2d 852 (2011) Shannon McCOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Edward BRICKLEY, Defendant. Plaintiff Shannon McComas was arrested in connection with the shooting and, although the charges against him were ultimately dropped, it was not before Mr. McComas was asked to and did, in fact, resign his position with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ("IMPD"). Mr. McComas brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the arresting officer, Detective Edward Brickley, for false arrest in more.

Citation: 867 F. Supp. 811 | Docket No.: Cause No. EV 93-101-C
Status: Published | Citing: 6
Summary: 867 F. Supp. The Sixth Circuit cases argued by the Defendants (In re Delta America, 900 F.2d 890 (6th Cir.1990) and Regis Assoc. v. Rank Hotels, 894 F.2d 193), are unavailing to their position.

Citation: 938 F. Supp. 521 | Docket No.: NA 94-128-C R/H
Status: Published | Citing: 10
Summary: 938 F. Supp. Relevant Factual Background On July 27, 1992, the Plaintiff in this cause, Robert U. Carpenter (hereinafter "Carpenter"), requested the following tax supporting documentation from the Defendant Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter "IRS"): ... all the supporting documents (i.e. Accounting Assessment Journals, Assessment lists, and document registers) which comply with the mandate of 26 CFR 301.6203-1 and IR Manual Chapter 5300, Section 5312 related to Form 23-C, "Assessment more.

Citation: 172 F. Supp. 2d 1060 | Docket No.: IP 95-0536-C-B/S
Status: Published | Citing: 30
Summary: 172 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (2001) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ZENITH GOLDLINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (formerly Zenith Laboratories, Inc.), Defendant. *1061 *1062 Paul H. Berghoff, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, Chicago, IL, Stephen M. Nickelsburg, Hunton & Williams, Washington, DC, John R. Schaibley, III, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, Thomas G. Slater, Jr., Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, Paul F. Ware, Jr., Goodwin Proctor & Hoar LLP, Boston, MA, for plaintiff. ENTRY DENYING more.

Citation: 102 F. Supp. 2d 1044 | Docket No.: EV 98-111-C-B/H
Status: Published | Citing: 27
Summary: 102 F. Supp. Plaintiff, Dennis Serio ("Serio"), comes before us seeking legal and equitable relief for defendant's alleged violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ("FMLA"), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. Serio claims that defendant, Jojo's Bakery Restaurant ("Jojo"),[1] improperly denied his entitlement to medical leave by terminating him from his management position shortly after he requested such leave. Besgen shared his concerns about Serio's performance with Jeff Wineman ("Wineman"), more.

Citation: 818 F. Supp. 1254 | Docket No.: IP 91-165-C
Status: Published | Citing: 28
Summary: 818 F. Supp. G. Paul Moates, Vincent F. Prada, Sidley & Austin, Washington, D.C., Lee B. McTurnan, McTurnan & Turner, Indianapolis, for defendant. The First Amendment deleted in its entirety Section 18 of the Letter Agreement, and added a revised Section 18 which (1) permitted termination of the Agreement if *1257 for any reason closing did not occur by March 31, 1990, and (2) included a new subsection (subsection (f)) which provided that the Letter Agreement could also be terminated without more.

Citation: 516 F. Supp. 73 | Docket No.: TH 79-178-C
Status: Published | Citing: 31
Summary: 516 F. Supp. Plaintiff has mounted an attack upon the legality of his transfer to federal custody pursuant to § 5003 citing the authority of Lono v. Fenton, 581 F.2d 645 (7th Cir. 1976); Shakur v. Bell, 447 F. Supp. 958 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Fletcher v. Warden, 467 F. Supp. 487 F. Supp. In Gomes v. Moran, 468 F. Supp. In a consolidated memorandum and order of the cases of Bowers v. Fenton, and Brown v. Fenton, 488 F. Supp. In Howe v. Civiletti, 480 F. Supp. In Battick v. Stoneman, 421 F. Supp. 421 F. more.

Citation: 595 F. Supp. 760 | Docket No.: IP 84-1311-C
Status: Published | Citing: 8
Summary: 595 F. Supp. This matter came to be heard on plaintiffs' September 20, 1984 complaint for a preliminary and permanent injunction 1) declaring certain of the election laws of the State of Indiana unconstitutional, 2) directing defendants, their agents and employees to place the name of the Populist Party and its certified candidates and presidential electors on the November, 1984 Indiana general election ballot, and 3) for an expedited hearing on the merits. Indiana Code Section 3-1-11-1 more.

Citation: 855 F. Supp. 267 | Docket No.: IP94-43-CR
Status: Published | Citing: 14
Summary: 855 F. Supp. U.S. v. Scherer, 673 F.2d 176, 181 (7th Cir.1982) (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143, 99 S. Ct. 421, 430, 58 L. Ed. U.S. v. Lovell, 849 F.2d 910, 913 (5th Cir.1988); see also U.S. v. Rivera, 825 F.2d 152, 158 (7th Cir.1987) (canine sniffing of luggage does not constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment), cert. 2d 492; U.S. v. Rem, 984 F.2d 806, 812 (7th Cir.1993) (the privacy interest of people in transit on public thoroughfares who have placed their more.

Citation: 128 F. Supp. 2d 1196 | Docket No.: IP 00-9373-C-B/S, IP 00-5000-C-B/S
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 128 F. Supp. Discussion Ms. McKinney has asked us to issue a Suggestion for Remand to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in the hope that this matter can be remanded to the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas for trial on June 25, 2001, a date set by that court before the case was transferred to us as a part of the MDL.

Citation: 464 F. Supp. 110 | Docket No.: NA 78-52-C
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 464 F. Supp. Richard C. O'Connor, New Albany, Ind., Jerry P. Belknap, Indianapolis, Ind., Charles F. Wilson, Tampa, Fla., for defendants. The second alleged violation is that defendants failed to make a refund within a reasonable time; I.C. 24-4.5-5-202(4) reads in pertinent part: "If a debtor is entitled to a refund and a person liable to the debtor refuses to make a refund within a reasonable time after demand, the debtor may recover from that person a penalty in an amount determined by a more.

Citation: 606 F. Supp. 2d 926 | Docket No.: 1:07-cv-1096-SEB-TAB
Status: Published | Citing: 36
Summary: 606 F. Supp. Peter Jon Prettyman, Richard A. Kempf, Thomas F. O'Gara, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant. This cause is before the court on Defendant, Australian Gold, Inc.'s ("Australian Gold") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on South Africa and the United Arab Emirates [Docket No. 37], filed on April 8, 2008; Australian Gold's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Mexico [Docket No. 39], filed on April 15, 2008; Australian Gold's Motion for Partial Summary more.

Citation: 120 F. Supp. 2d 1155 | Docket No.: IP 00-0592-C-H/G
Status: Published | Citing: 78
Summary: 120 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (2000) MIDWESTERN GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. William D. McCARTY, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission; David A. Hadley, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission; Judith G. Ripley, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission; Camie J. Swanson-Hull, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission; David more.

Citation: 922 F. Supp. 171 | Docket No.: NA-95-45-C-R/H
Status: Published | Citing: 9
Summary: 922 F. Supp. 171 (1996) John W. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. Robert F. SCHAFER, Defendant. The issue before the Court (with respect to defendant Schafer's motion anyway) is whether this is a suit against an employee of a political subdivision of Indiana, and, if so, whether, given that plaintiff did not comply with the ITCA by providing prompt notice of his claim to the proper agency, these claims are barred.