1725 search results for query

Citation: 10 F. Supp. 94 | Docket No.: 5254, 5255
Status: Published | Citing: 1
Summary: 10 F. Supp. M. F. Mitchell and George G. Witter, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Citation: 176 F. Supp. 38 | Docket No.: Bankruptcy No. 85242
Status: Published | Citing: 7
Summary: 176 F. Supp. f. Petitioner on review, a creditor, requests that the sale be set aside on the ground that the Referee failed to give "at least ten days' notice by mail" of the intended sale as required by § 58, sub. Butler v. Ellis, 4 Cir., 1930, 45 F.2d 951, 956; In re Kyte, D.C.M.D.Pa.1911, 189 F. 531; 6 Remington on Bankruptcy § 2539 (5th ed. a(4) of the Bankruptcy Act, the Referee's order of January 19, 1959, confirming sale of the inventory of the bankrupt water-service company must be more.

Citation: 63 F. Supp. 175 | Docket No.: Civil Action No. 2597
Status: Published | Citing: 12
Summary: 63 F. Supp. The United States of America has filed an amended complaint in condemnation in this court on September 7th, 1943, against certain parcels of land in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, designated as parcels 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12; County of Los Angeles, a body politic and corporate; State of California, a corporation sovereign; Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, a corporation; Union Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation; and the City of Los Angeles, a more.

Citation: 68 F. Supp. 418 | Docket No.: 5421
Status: Published | Citing: 7
Summary: 68 F. Supp. LONG BEACH FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK et al. We look to the statute to see whether the Congress has declared a policy with respect to the providing of rules and regulations for the reorganization, consolidation, merger, or liquidation of federal savings and loan associations, including the power to appoint a conservator or receiver to take charge of the affairs of any such association, and to require an equitable readjustment of the capital stock of the more.

Citation: 114 F. Supp. 2d 992 | Docket No.: 97-CV-0359 W JAH
Status: Published | Citing: 57
Summary: 114 F. Supp. 2d 538 (1986); Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D Co., 68 F.3d 1216, 1221 (9th Cir.1995) (citing Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252, 106 S. Ct. at 2512) ("The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the non-moving party's position is not sufficient."). International Jensen, Inc. v. Metrosound U.S.A., Inc., 4 F.3d 819, 822 (9th Cir.1993); Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp., 888 F.2d 609, 613 (9th Cir. Disc Golf Ass'n, Inc. v. Champion Discs, Inc., 158 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th more.

Citation: 169 B.R. 684 | Docket No.: Civ. Nos. 94-906 R (AJB), 94-911 K (AJB), 94-907 IEG (AJB), 94-913 R (AJB), 94-909 GT (CGA), 94-914 H (AJB), 94-915 B (CM), 94-910 S (AJB), 94-912 B (BTM), 94-917 K (BTM), 94-918 R (LSP), and 94-916 GT (CM)
Status: Published | Citing: 26
Summary: 169 B.R. 684 (1994) Robert L. WILLIAMS and Nancy K. Williams, Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Gene CIOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Robert HERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES BRASS CORP., et al., Defendants. DUNHAM & ASSOCIATES ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. FIRST FEDERAL BANK, et al., Defendants. Donald WOFFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Alberto IGNACIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GASCON more.

Citation: 678 F. Supp. 1463 | Docket No.: Crim. No. 87-1279-B
Status: Published | Citing: 39
Summary: 678 F. Supp. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INVALIDATE GUIDELINES PROMULGATED BY THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, AND RELATED ORDERS BREWSTER, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Defendants move the court for an order declaring the sentencing guidelines ("Guidelines") promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission ("Commission") pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 ("Act"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 991-98 (1987), invalid on the grounds that the Act violates the delegation doctrine and more.

Citation: 353 F. Supp. 2d 1095 | Docket No.: 03CV0594BTMLSP
Status: Published | Citing: 57
Summary: 353 F. Supp. This case arises out of the seizure by the United States of approximately 64,695 pounds of shark fins discovered aboard the M/V KING DIAMOND II ("KD II"), a U.S. flag vessel. On September 13, 2004, the United States filed a motion for summary judgment seeking summary adjudication on the narrow issue of whether the KD II is a "fishing vessel" under the SFPA. Tai Loong chartered *1097 the KD II to purchase shark fins and shark carcasses from foreign fishing vessels at prearranged more.

Citation: 598 F. Supp. 2d 1104 | Docket No.: Case No. 06CV1952 JLS (JMA)
Status: Published | Citing: 18
Summary: (2008) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. NEOVI, INC., d/b/a Neovi Data Corporation and, et al., Defendants. BACKGROUND I. Parties Defendant Neovi is a California corporation.In addition to his positions at Neovi, Danforth is also G7's Executive Vice President ("EVP"), CFO, Secretary, and, as with Neovi, its registered service agent. After Neovi declared bankruptcy in October 2007, Defendants Villwock and Danforth established iProlog Corporation, which hired all Neovi employees more.

Citation: 46 F. Supp. 682 | Docket No.: 2127-BH
Status: Published | Citing: 19
Summary: 46 F. Supp. (United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co., 255 U.S. 81, 41 S. Ct. 298, 65 L. Ed. 688); and that an order or regulation made by an officer or agency of the government and providing for the punishment for violations must be strictly construed (Matthew Addy Co. v. United States, 264 U.S. 239, 44 S. Ct. 300, 68 L. Ed. Defendants chiefly rely on the case of United States v. Lynah, 188 U.S. 445, 23 S. Ct. 349, 355, 47 L. Ed. Stephens v. United States, 9 Cir., 261 F. 590; Hamm v. United more.

Citation: 563 F. Supp. 438 | Docket No.: Crim. No. 82-0640-JLI
Status: Published | Citing: 12
Summary: 563 F. Supp. The sole issue presented for this Court's determination is whether four of six counts in a superseding indictment should be dismissed because of a violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq, and if so, whether that dismissal should be with or without prejudice. United States v. Wilks, 629 F.2d 669 (10th Cir.1980) most squarely conforms to the government's position. The court not only held that absent prejudice to the defendants, a superseding indictment may be more.

Citation: 226 F. Supp. 2d 1234 | Docket No.: CIV. 02CV348(AJB)
Status: Published | Citing: 15
Summary: 226 F. Supp. Nonetheless, this Court concludes that the Government is correct, and that this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the decision of the Food and Nutrition Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, disqualifying the Plaintiff store from participating in the Federal Food Stamp Program. Gallo Cattle Company v. United States Dept. of Agriculture, 159 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1998) (statute providing for judicial review of USDA's Dairy Promotion Program defines scope of more.

Citation: 20 F. Supp. 69 | Docket No.: Q-12-C
Status: Published | Citing: 7
Summary: 20 F. Supp. Action to quiet title to part of Mormon Island in the inner bay of San Pedro brought by the City of Los Angeles against the Pacific Coast Borax Company and another, after judgment in a former trial reversed on appeal. City of Los Angeles v. Borax Consolidated Limited (C.C.A.) 74 F.(2d) 901; Borax Consolidated v. Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 56 S. Ct. 23, 80 L. Ed. These elevations were accepted by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey and all other government agencies until 1927 more.

Citation: 426 F. Supp. 2d 1124 | Docket No.: 05CV0088-DMS(JMA)
Status: Published | Citing: 9
Summary: 426 F. Supp. Respondents seek dismissal of Petitioner's habeas claim pursuant to a "jurisdiction stripping" provision of the REAL ID Act of 2005, which amended § 242(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. Respondents' principal argument is that the INA, as amended by the REAL ID Act, confers exclusive jurisdiction in the courts of appeal to review a final order of removal and, therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner's claim of United States citizenship and challenge to more.

Citation: 696 F. Supp. 2d 1141 | Docket No.: Case No. 09cr3695 BTM
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 696 F. Supp. Defendant James Dean Stacy has filed (1) a motion to dismiss the Indictment because it is in violation of the Tenth Amendment; (2) a motion to dismiss the Indictment as a violation of due process; and (3) a motion to dismiss the Indictment because the prosecutor is acting in direct conflict with the U.S. Department of Justice policy. *1144 A. Tenth Amendment Claim Defendant argues that by prosecuting him and others like him, the federal government is subverting state medical more.

Citation: 224 F. Supp. 546 | Docket No.: 2752
Status: Published | Citing: 23
Summary: 224 F. Supp. 546 (1963) AMMEX WAREHOUSE COMPANY OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., and Ammex Warehouse Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Malcolm Harris, Director for the State of California, Arthur F. Brown, District Supervisor, Southern District of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, James D. Keller, District Attorney for San Diego County, California, and James E. Marable, District Attorney for Imperial County, California, more.

Citation: 52 F. Supp. 2d 1183 | Docket No.: 98 CV 1772-B(AJB), 98 CV 2121-B (AJB)
Status: Published | Citing: 20
Summary: 52 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (1999) Gretchen DUMAS, as Guardian ad litem for Nicholas Chaset, and Irene Torres, as Guardian ad litem for Jon Rodriquez, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC., Major League Baseball Players Association, NBA Properties Inc., National Football League Players Association d/b/a NFL Players, Inc., and Players Inc., National Hockey League Enterprises, NHL Players Association and The Walt Disney Company, more.

Citation: 549 F. Supp. 2d 1240 | Docket No.: Civil No. 06cv2390-L(POR)
Status: Published | Citing: 18
Summary: (2008) Laquan A. HAYES, Petitioner, v. George J. GIURBINO, Respondent. Laquan A. Hayes, a pro se state prisoner, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1989); see also Wilkins v. Ramirez, 455 F. Supp. After reviewing the Report in its entirety, the Court finds that the magistrate judge correctly concluded that petitioner's lengthy indeterminate sentence under California Penal Code § 667 did not violate more.

Citation: 148 F. Supp. 720 | Docket No.: 18088
Status: Published | Citing: 39
Summary: 148 F. Supp. By his complaint the plaintiff, Leon A. Flax, now a resident of California, seeks to recover the sum of $5,495.26 with 7% interest from February 19, 1955, which he alleges to be due to him from the defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey corporation, as the surrender value of a policy of life insurance issued to him in the State of New York on February 10, 1916, when the plaintiff was a resident of New York. On that day, the complaint alleges, when the more.