1827 search results for query *

Summary: 850 F. Supp. The plaintiffs are lawyers, as are the defendants, Charles Sweeney Jr. and Daniel H. Pfeifer, and once upon a time, they were all in the same law firm with offices in South Bend, Indiana, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and elsewhere, which engaged extensively in television advertising focused principally on the solicitation of personal injury litigation. However, in the interest of the greatest caution, all of these parties, namely, Thomas Blackburn, Raymond T. Green, Charles Sweeney, Jr. more.

Summary: 55 F. Supp. Mr. Olinger wants to play in the May 24, 1999 local qualifying at the South Bend Country Club, but the USGA forbids the use of carts by participants in the U.S. Open and its qualifying rounds, and Mr. Olinger can no longer walk the course while playing a round of golf. See Welsh v. Boy Scouts of America, 993 F.2d at 1270-1271 (rejecting the argument that "places of public accommodation" include membership organizations lacking a close connection to a specific facility); Elitt v. more.

Summary: 648 F. Supp. I. On October 31, 1986, defendant Gwenda Steele, a Postal Service employee, was questioned by two United States Postal Inspectors concerning a money shortage discovered at an East Chicago, Indiana Post Office. United States v. Madison, 689 F.2d 1300, 1308 (7th Cir.1982). United States v. Manbeck, 744 F.2d 360, 379 (4th Cir.1984) cert. United States v. Hudgens, 798 F.2d 1234, 1236 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Striefel, 781 F.2d 953, 961 (1st Cir.1986).

Summary: 264 B.R. 908 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David E. BUCKNER and Federal Express Corporation, Defendant. J. Michael Oehmler, Federal Express Corporation, Legal Department, Litigation, Memphis, TN, for Federal Express Corporation. 72.1(d)(1) this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Roger Cosbey to submit a Report and Recommendation on Count 1 of the Amended Complaint filed by the plaintiff, the United States of America against the Defendant, David E. Buckner. On February 27, more.

Summary: (2008) Michael CAMPBELL, Connie Campbell, and Duane Campbell, Plaintiffs, v. SUPERVALU, INC., d/b/a Scott's, f/k/a Cub Foods, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION[1] In 1993, Duane and Connie Campbell bought some ground beef at a Cub Food store that they contend was tainted and made their then five-year old son, Michael, seriously ill. The Campbells, Duane, Connie, and Michael (now an adult), filed suit nearly thirteen years later against Supervalu, Inc., which operates a chain of food stores called more.

Summary: 286 F. Supp. This is a class action in which the plaintiff and members of her class seek damages against the defendant corporation for allegedly aiding, abetting, and assisting a securities dealer in the alleged violation by the securities dealer of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. In an order entered September 23, 1966, which is reported at 259 F. Supp. The court has more.

Summary: (2008) GREENFIELD MILLS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert E. CARTER, Jr., as Director of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, et al., Defendants. On February 13, 2008, the Defendants filed a "Notice of Settlement of Matters at Issue in Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Interim Attorney's Fees." The court held a conference with counsel on April 6, 2008 at which time, new counsel appeared for the Defendants (in addition to Defendants' counsel already on the record) and advised that the more.

Summary: 692 F. Supp. 56(e); Wilson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.R. Co., 841 F.2d 1347 (7th Cir.1988); Munson v. Friske, 754 F.2d 683 (7th Cir.1985). 2d 265 (1986); Donald v. Polk County, 836 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 2d 202 (1986); Anderson v. University of Wisconsin, 841 F.2d 737 (7th Cir.1988). Bowyer v. United States Dept. of Air Force, 804 F.2d 428 (7th Cir.1986). The parties cannot rest on mere allegations in the pleadings, Boruski v. United States, 803 F.2d 1421 (7th Cir.1986), or upon more.

Summary: 263 F. Supp. Alfred W. Moellering, U. S. Atty., Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert F. Sama and Gene A. Castleberry, Attys., Department of Justice, for defendant. Fides Publishers Association (taxpayer) filed its complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 seeking to recover taxes assessed and paid for the tax year ended December 31, 1958. A deficiency of $2,893.31 was assessed for the 1958 tax year, which the taxpayer paid under protest, and for which he filed a claim for refund with the more.

Summary: 596 F. Supp. See also Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. United Transportation Union, 734 F.2d 317 (7th Cir.1984); Korf v. Ball State University, 726 F.2d 1222 (7th Cir.1984). Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 296-97 (7th Cir.1983); Collins v. American Optometric Assn., 693 F.2d 636, 639 (7th Cir.1982). 888 (1940); Hutchinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 1322, 1327 (9th Cir.1982); Akers v. United States, 539 F. Supp. 2d 271 (1980); White v. Commissioner, 537 F. Supp. See Morris v. United more.

Summary: 174 F. Supp. 2d 843 (2001) Darnell WILLIAMS Petitioner, v. Rondle ANDERSON, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, Respondent. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. Petitioner, Darnell Williams, was convicted of murder in a state court trial conducted in Lake County, Indiana, and was sentenced to death by the judge conducting that trial upon the recommendation of the jury that heard the case. The within petition was filed by counsel in this Court on May 12, 2000 and more.

Summary: 784 F. Supp. After the court of appeals affirmed his conviction and 360-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, United States v. Jennings, 544 F.3d 815 (7th Cir.2008), Keith Jennings filed (and then amended) a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The principal case on which Mr. Jennings constructs his argument — United States v. Smith, 544 F.3d 781 (7th Cir.2008) — already had been decided when the court of appeals affirmed Mr. Jennings's conviction. Varela v. United more.

Summary: 626 F. Supp. In its Memorandum of Decision and Order entered on November 28, 1984, this court held that the policy of the Indiana Department of Public Welfare (DPW) considering Old Age, Survivor and Disability Insurance (OASDI) benefits received by a representative payee on behalf of a child as "income" to an AFDC applicant and his or her family for the purpose of calculating AFDC benefits was in violation of applicable federal law. On July 18, 1984, Congress passed the Deficit Reduction Act of more.

Summary: 369 F. Supp. Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 F.2d 1205, 1229 (7th Cir.1984); Johnson v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 903 F. Supp. Doe v. Howe Military School, 227 F.3d 981, 987 (7th Cir.2000); see also Snodderly v. R.U.F.F. Drug Enforcement Task Force, 239 F.3d 892, 894 (7th Cir.2001) (Two-year statute of limitations "is applicable to all causes of action brought in Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983").

Summary: 904 F. Supp. Heritage filed a Notice of Removal contending that the plaintiffs' complaint alleges a breach of an obligation created by the CBA between IBEW and TCI which must, pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 185, be resolved in a federal forum. TCI asserts that this court has subject matter jurisdiction because the complaint actually alleges a violation of the CBA, while the plaintiffs claim that their complaint alleges an action arising under more.

Summary: 826 F. Supp. On or about October 30, 1987, Oberweis contacted Schwartz and attempted to convince him to enter into a Secured Demand Note ("SDN") and Secured Demand Note Collateral Agreement for Equity Capital ("Collateral Agreement") to finance OSI, the securities broker-dealer which is owned and controlled by Oberweis. The eight-count Complaint alleges that Oberweis individually violated Indiana's Blue Sky Law and conversion statute, committed actual and constructive fraud, breached a more.

Summary: 704 F. Supp. As the court in United States v. Moore, 627 F.2d 830 (7th Cir.1980), stated: The forms defendant supplied to the I.R. S. were not returns for another reason: they were not verified. See, among hundreds of other cases, United States v. Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250, 1253 (7th Cir.1986); Lovell v. United States, 755 F.2d 517 (7th Cir.1984); Granzow v. CIR, 739 F.2d 265, 267 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Koliboski, 732 F.2d 1328, 1329 & n. 1 (7th Cir.1984). United States v. Milder, 459 more.

Summary: 710 F. Supp. 1172 (1989) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (EPA), Plaintiff, and Supporters to Oppose Pollution, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. (1) ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE CONTROL, INC., d/b/a Four County Landfill; (2) Steven W. Shambaugh; (3) James A. Wilkins; and (4) West Holding Company, Defendants. *1173 *1174 *1175 *1176 *1177 *1178 Robert Oakley, F. Henry Habicht, Frank Bentkover, Sam Boxerman, Environmental Enforcement Section, Land & Natural Resources Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Anna Thode, Office more.

Summary: 617 F. Supp. 800 (1985) Robert A. MORRISON d/b/a Morrison Enterprises, Plaintiff, v. MURRAY BISCUIT COMPANY, Defendant. Cory Brundage, Debra S. Easterday, Indianapolis, Ind., Thomas F. Lewis, Jr., South Bend, Ind., for defendant. The Supreme Court of the United States, in Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 465 U.S. 752, 104 S. Ct. 1464, 79 L. Ed. at 1471; citing, Edward J. Sweeney & Sons v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F.2d 105, 111 (3d Cir.1980), cert. 2d 300 (1981); H.L. Moore Drug Exchange v. more.