Clear

4669 search results for query *


Summary: 560 F. Supp. Janice F. Kerr, J. Calvin Simpson, Lawrence Q. Garcia, The Public Utilities Com'n of the State of Cal., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Public Utilities Com'n. Charles T. Van Deusen, John N. Frye, Shirley A. Sanderson, Donald Erickson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Pacific Gas and Elec. Co. The Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1983) provides: "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state ... subjects, or causes to b......read more.


Summary: 717 F. Supp. 2d 895 (2010) KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Brian MURPHY, Renwick Thompson, Peter Hooper, Ruixia Chen, and InspecStar, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendants. Diego F. Acevedo, James Antone Lassart, for Defendants. Plaintiff KLA-Tencor Corp. ("KT" or the "company") bought this action against individual defendants Brian Murphy, Renwick Thompson, Peter Hooper, and Ruixia Chen, and corporate defendant InspecStar, LLC ("InspecStar") for a......read more.


Summary: 281 F. Supp. 598 (1967) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William E. THORESEN, III, and Louise B. Thoresen, Defendants. United States District Court N. D. California. *599 *600 Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff. John J. Flynn, Lewis, Roca, Beauchamp & Linton, Phoenix, Ariz., George T. Davis, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant William Thoresen. F. Lee Bailey, Boston, Mass., Benjamin Lazarow, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant Louise Thoresen. Defendan......read more.


Summary: 48 F. Supp. Bruce G. Vanyo, Boris Feldman, Nina F. Locker, Ignacio E. Salceda, Rebecca L. Epstein, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, for defendants Mark B. Hoffman, Robert S. Epstein, and Sybase, Inc. In their class action complaint, plaintiffs allege that Sybase and certain of its officers and executives made false and misleading statements about its products and issued false earnings forecasts about the financial condition of Sybase from November 14, 1994 to April 3, 1995. There......read more.


Summary: 55 F. Supp. Fred Benioff Co., a California corporation, engaged in the business of retailing ladies' furs, fur garments and other types of women's apparel in San Francisco and elsewhere, commenced this action for injunction and damages against defendant Fred Benioff claiming: (1) Infringement of United States registered trademark No. 236829 (Trademark Act of 1920, 41 Stat. 104, 15 U.S.C.A. § 121 et seq.), being a label for use in connection with garments offered for sale and having inscribed the......read more.


Summary: 297 F. Supp. John E. GORDON and Vivian F. Gordon, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. It provides that "in the case of bonds, debentures, notes, or certificates or other evidences of indebtedness, which are capital assets in the hands of the taxpayer, and which are issued by any corporation, or government or political subdivision thereof — Amounts received by the holder on retirement of such bonds or other evidences of indebtedness shall be considered as amounts received in excha......read more.


Summary: 976 F. Supp. On June 5, 1997, Ellen Fritz, Berger's probation officer, notified the Court through a "Form 12 — Petition for Probation Action" that Berger had tested positive for THC metabolite (marijuana); Fritz recommended that the matter be handled administratively and that I take no action at that time. At his initial appearance, Berger moved to dismiss the probation revocation proceeding on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction over the proceeding because it had been initiated by th......read more.


Summary: 348 F. Supp. *492 *493 Ralph Santiago Abascal, Jay-Allen Eisen, Edmund S. Schaffer, Jerry D. Craig, S. F. Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation, Peter Coppelman, Senior Citizens Project, Cal. Plaintiffs, some of whom are individuals currently receiving benefits under the Medi-Cal program and two of which are unincorporated organizations alleged to be largely composed of Medi-Cal recipients, have brought this action to challenge the decision of the defendant Richardson, Secretary of Health, Ed......read more.


Summary: 424 F. Supp. On July 16, 1975, this court made its order finding that defendants, Department of Interior, Secretary of Interior and Assistant Secretary thereof for Fish, Wildlife and Parks (hereinafter, "Interior"), had failed to take steps to exercise and perform certain duties imposed upon Interior by the National Park System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and by the Redwood National Park Act, 16 U.S.C. § 79a et seq., for the protection of that Park, 398 F. Supp.


Summary: 167 F. Supp. 384 (1958) Albert D. BONELL, individually, and Albert D. Bonell, doing business as Bonell Refrigeration Co., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Limited, an alien corporation, and Robert J. Bitts (realigned as plaintiff), Defendants. The term `products hazard' shall mean "(1) the handling or use of, the existence of any condition in or a warranty of any goods or products manufactured, sold, handled or distributed by or for the named insured, other tha......read more.


Summary: 436 F. Supp. 1273 (1977) Dorothy BANNERMAN and Willie Mae McGovern, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH AUTHORITY, Allen F. Breed, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Youth Authority, Al Ow-young, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of the Division of Personnel Management, Webster Williams, Individually and in his official capacity as Program Manager for Talliver Community Center, Ni......read more.


Summary: 312 F. Supp. Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., with Asst. U. S. Atty. William B. Spohn, for Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Plaintiffs seek in their own behalf and as representatives of their respective classes to have this court declare that section 11351 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code, and the related sections of the California Public Social Services Manual (PSSM), are contrary to federal regulations interpreting the Social Security Act and are unco......read more.


Summary: 569 F. Supp. Permit members" are individuals who have paid dues for three years or more, but still have not satisfied the six year "on deck" work experience requirement necessary to attain full book member status. In 1979, the U.S. Department of Labor notified defendant Paul Dempster, President and Secretary Treasurer of SUP, that the Department considered unreasonable and unlawful the union's six year requirement for full book status. Kupau v. Yamamoto, 622 F.2d 449 (9th Cir.1980). Denov v. Chi......read more.


Summary: 215 F. Supp. 756 (1963) Norman McKEEL, Libelant, v. Michael F. SCHROEDER and the AMERICAN OIL SCREW MANDY, her engines, furniture, apparel, tackle, etc., and all persons claiming or to claim said vessel, Respondents. This is a libel in admiralty in rem and in personam commenced by Norman McKeel, the owner and operator of the fishing vessel "MA NEE", to recover for loss of his vessel occasioned by a collision between it and the fishing vessel "MANDY", owned and operated by respondent Michael F. S......read more.


Summary: 369 F. Supp. 12(b); United States v. Shortt Accountancy Corp., 785 F.2d 1448, 1452 (9th Cir.)*1153 Winslow v. United States, 216 F.2d 912, 913 (9th Cir.)1254 (1955); United States v. Ruiz-Castro, 125 F. Supp. In United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.)See United States v. Quintana-Quintana, 383 F.3d 1052, 1053 (9th Cir.)United States v. Gondinez-Rabadan, 289 F.3d 630, 633 (9th Cir.2002) (citing United States v. Quintana-Torres, 235 F.3d 1197, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2000)), cert. See ......read more.


Summary: 365 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (2005) Richard A. CANATELLA, Plaintiff, v. Ronald W. STOVITZ, Presiding Judge of the State Bar Court, San Francisco; Judith A. Epstein, Review Judge, San Francisco; Madge S. Watai, Review Judge, Los Angeles; Richard A. Honn, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles; Patrice E. McElroy, Hearing Judge, San Francisco; Alban I. Niles, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles; Joann M. Remke, Hearing Judge, San Francisco; Robert M. Talcott, Supervising Hearing Judge, Los Angeles; James E. Herman, President ......read more.


Summary: 218 F. Supp. Plaintiffs have standing to bring each of their claims, and have established beyond doubt that defendants have violated the Act in that (1) several among the defendant agencies have not met the annual AFV-acquisition requirements set forth in the Act (Count I); (2) the defendant agencies have failed to compile and to properly make publicly available the compliance reports required by the Act (Count II); and (3) the Department of Energy has not met the rulemaking deadlines for privat......read more.


Summary: 352 F. Supp. Plaintiffs Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. and plaintiff-intervenor Sierra Club seek to enjoin the letting of bids and further work on the main dam contract, contending that (1) defendants have failed to comply with the provisions of NEPA and that (2) defendants have failed to obtain permits from the California Water Resources Control Board to appropriate and divert *54 water from the Stanislaus River before proceeding with the construction of the New Melones Dam, as requir......read more.


Summary: 480 F. Supp. Plaintiffs Rudell Willey and Richard Olsen each filed suit against Southern Pacific Transportation Company and their collective bargaining representatives[1] alleging that they were denied transfers to the position of fireman/engineer in 1976 and 1977 in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.[2] The two cases were consolidated and came on for trial before the Court on October 9, 10, and 11, 1979. Nevertheless, under the recent holding i......read more.


Summary: 333 F. Supp. *861 CORRECTED ORDER: GRANTING DEFENDANTS' CONSOLIDATED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE '400 PATENT [Docket No. 568], DENYING UI'S MOTION TO STRIKE IN PART THE DECLARATION OF FUJITSU'S EXPERT, DR. SILZARS [Docket No. 575], DENYING DEFENDANTS' AND COUNTER-CLAIMANTS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME [Docket No. 627], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FUJITSU'S MOTION TO STRIKE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EVIDENCE OBJECTIONS......read more.