4865 search results for query

Citation: 701 F. Supp. 1084 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 87-462
Status: Published | Citing: 22
Summary: 701 F. Supp. 1084 (1988) ALLIED CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. James V. FROLA, et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. BASF WYANDOTTE CORP., et al., Third Party Defendants. *1085 Edward N. Fitzpatrick, John A. Avery, Clapp & Eisenberg, Newark, N.J., for defendants and third-party plaintiffs Frola and Von Dohln. Karen L. Jordan, Greenberg & Prior, Princeton, N.J., for third-party defendants Waste Recovery, Inc. and Quanta Holding Corp. Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss the more.

Citation: 218 F. Supp. 2d 643 | Docket No.: CIVIL ACTION No. 01-3244(JEI)
Status: Published | Citing: 19
Summary: 218 F. Supp. 2d 643 (2002) Larry JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. ALLGROUP WHEATON, Defendant. Pro se Plaintiff, Larry Jordan, brought this employment discrimination action against Defendant AllGroup Wheaton, his former employer, alleging racial discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et. [1] Because Plaintiff has failed to adduce sufficient evidence to rebut Defendant's proffered legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for his termination, more.

Citation: 661 F. Supp. 543 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 86-4207
Status: Published | Citing: 23
Summary: 661 F. Supp. Brian F. McDonough, Shanley & Fisher, P.C., Morristown, N.J., for defendant. Defendant moves before this court pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., seeking to compel arbitration of plaintiff's ADEA and related state claims. Defendant now moves before the court pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. to require arbitration of plaintiff's ADEA and related state claims. DISCUSSION I. Plaintiff's ADEA Claim In determining the more.

Citation: 342 F. Supp. 928 | Docket No.: Crim. No. 418-63
Status: Published | Citing: 33
Summary: 342 F. Supp. United States v Butenko, 384 F.2d 554 (3 Cir. These were: John F. Malone, Assistant Director of the FBI, in charge of the New York Office of the FBI. It was Schmit who, based on information in his possession, recommended the electronic surveillance of Ivanov; Lawrence McWilliams, Special Agent of the FBI, and Supervisor of a squad in the Espionage and Foreign Intelligence Division of the FBI New York Office. He did, however, conduct a visual surveillance of Ivanov in New York; more.

Citation: 565 F. Supp. 2d 560 | Docket No.: Civ. No. 08-607 (GEB)
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: (2008) John DOES and PKF-Mark III, Inc., Plaintiffs v. CITY OF TRENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS—Water Division, Defendant. This matter comes before the Court upon the motion for injunctive relief of John Does and PKF—Mark ("Plaintiffs") enjoining the city of Trenton ("Trenton" or "the city") from disseminating names, addresses and social security numbers of PKF employees to any third party. I. BACKGROUND A. Allegations of the Complaint PKF is a general contractor engaged in the business of more.

Citation: 934 F. Supp. 669 | Docket No.: 94-5059 (JBS)
Status: Published | Citing: 41
Summary: 934 F. Supp. OPINION SIMANDLE, District Judge: Plaintiff, Judith Schanzer, brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, against Rutgers University (hereinafter "Rutgers") and numerous of its employees, including President Francis Lawrence, Provost Walter Gordon, Dean Robert Catlin, and Professor Joseph Walker, alleging that she was unlawfully discriminated against on the basis of her race, sex, and religion while an Assistant more.

Citation: 592 F. Supp. 1489 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 83-3338
Status: Published | Citing: 35
Summary: 592 F. Supp. This is an action brought under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary), which denied plaintiff's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The ALJ decided plaintiff's case by following the Secretary's five-step disability evaluation procedure, outlined in 20 C.F.R. more.

Citation: 224 F. Supp. 2d 834 | Docket No.: Civil Action No. 99-3185 JBS
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: 224 F. Supp. Presently before this Court is a motion to intervene in this closed case by The Press of Atlantic City ("The Press") for the limited purpose of learning the terms of the Settlement Agreement between plaintiffs and defendant Delaware River and Bay Authority ("DRBA"). The principal issues presented are whether The Press has standing to intervene, whether intervention is proper, what judicial documents this Court has authority over, whether access will be granted to the judicial more.

Citation: 750 F. Supp. 1222 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 89-4679
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 750 F. Supp. 1222 (1990) HOFFMAN EQUIPMENT, INC., Hoffman International, Inc., Hoffman Rigging and Crane Service, Inc., Far Hills, Inc., Reliance Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendant. *1223 Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Woodbridge, N.J., and Gordon C. Rhea, Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, for plaintiffs Hoffman Equipment, Inc., Hoffman Intern., Inc., Hoffman Rigging and Crane Service, Inc. and Far Hills, Inc. Joseph F. more.

Citation: 563 F. Supp. 102 | Docket No.: Civ. 83-589
Status: Published | Citing: 35
Summary: 563 F. Supp. Although the file in this court does not disclose the details, it was established at oral argument that plaintiffs duly filed an administrative claim with the U.S. Postal Service as a precondition to suit, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, chapter 171 of Title 28, U.S.C., or 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. Thus, in the hypothetical example, if the administrative claim is filed on June 2, 1980, and final denial is mailed on June 3, 1980, suit cannot be filed later than December 3, 1980, more.

Citation: 407 F. Supp. 2d 607 | Docket No.: MDL No. 1384, 00-2931(JCL), 00-2931, 00-3522, 00-4168, 00-4589, 00-6073, 01-0193, 01-0611, 01-1537, 01-2194, 03-1545, 03-1824, 03-4017, 04-2859, 04-4789
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 407 F. Supp. At the *609 time of their association with Darby, Mr. Lindvall and Ms. Clarke were primarily responsible for the representation of Defendant Ivax Corporation ("Ivax") in the Gabapentin action. According to Ivax and the other First-Wave Defendants, Mr. Lindvall and Ms. Clarke were privy to confidential attorney work-product and privileged information relating not only to Ivax, but to all First-Wave Defendants: Mr. Lindvall and Ms. Clarke established and executed defense strategy; more.

Citation: 891 F. Supp. 189 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 94-3143 (MTB)
Status: Published | Citing: 36
Summary: 891 F. Supp. I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Hypolitus Nwachia brings this petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking *191 to have his sentence vacated to allow for the entry of a "not guilty" plea, or, in the alternative, to have his sentence reduced to correct for alleged double-counting and/or to rescind the determination that petitioner qualifies as a Career Offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Second, petitioner contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel inasmuch as more.

Citation: 119 F. Supp. 727 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 1252-52
Status: Published | Citing: 2
Summary: 119 F. Supp. 383; Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co., 2 Cir., 1952, 189 F.2d 871, and Burrell v. La Follette Coach Lines, D.C.E.D.Tenn.N.D., 1951, 97 F. Supp.

Citation: 678 F. Supp. 89 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 87-2517
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 678 F. Supp. Moreover, defendants analogize to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., under which there is no right to a jury trial, because the Act only authorizes relief which is equitable in nature, such as reinstatement and backpay. 2d 691 (1963) ("the right to a jury trial in the federal courts is to be determined as a matter of federal law in diversity as well as other actions"); Puretest Ice Cream, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 614 F. Supp. Thus, the issue is more.

Citation: 32 F. Supp. 956 | Docket No.: 430
Status: Published | Citing: 3
Summary: 32 F. Supp. This practice was followed in the instant case and the question now arises as to whether or not the filing of the specification of defenses, pursuant to the statutory practice of the court, is to be construed as the filing of an answer or plea when considered in connection with the provisions of the Removal Act.

Citation: 546 F. Supp. 2d 182 | Docket No.: Civil Action No. 06-1391 (JLL)
Status: Published | Citing: 16
Summary: (2008) WATKINS v. WEBER, et al. February 20, 2008. Dear Parties: This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants Anthony R. Gualano, Louis Serterides, Denise Cobham, Yvonne S. Segars and John R. Bowser's (hereinafter "Public Defender Defendants")[1] motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Due to a different legal conflict, however, Ms. Denise Cobham, the Deputy Public Defender of the Hudson Trial Region, reassigned Plaintiffs criminal matter to more.

Citation: 755 F. Supp. 2d 632 | Docket No.: Civil Action No. 09-5076 (JEI/AMD)
Status: Published | Citing: 7
Summary: 755 F. Supp. 2d 632 (2010) ELECTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY and United States Liability Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. ESTATE OF Teddy MARCANTONIS by Dina MARCANTONIS a/k/a Konstandina Marcantonis, Defendant. OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs Electric Insurance Company ("EIC") and United States Liability Insurance Company ("USLI") seek a declaration of no coverage under the insurance policies issued to Teddy Marcantonis ("Marcantonis"). EIC issued a homeowner's insurance policy ( more.

Citation: 434 F. Supp. 988 | Docket No.: B-76-1562
Status: Published | Citing: 45
Summary: 434 F. Supp. Appellant American Training Services, Inc. [ATS] is a private vocational training school which sought, as debtor in proceedings for an arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, an order in the Bankruptcy Court of this district to enjoin the United States Veterans Administration [VA] and the New Jersey Department of Education from refusing to continue to pay VA educational benefits on behalf of eligible ATS students who had entered into certain tuition funding arrangements more.

Citation: 256 F. Supp. 2d 290 | Docket No.: CIV.A.02-05222(FLW)
Status: Published | Citing: 55
Summary: 256 F. Supp. 2d 290 (2003) L.M., a minor child, by his parents, H.M. and E.M., Plaintiffs, v. EVESHAM TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. H.M. and E.M., the parents of L.M., a child classified as eligible for special education services, appeal a ruling by a New Jersey Administrative Law Judge, which held that New Jersey law precluded the Evesham School Board from reimbursing L.M.'s parents for the costs attendant to placing him in a private sectarian school while challenging the more.

Citation: 71 F. Supp. 2d 420 | Docket No.: Criminal No. 98-338
Status: Published | Citing: 15
Summary: 71 F. Supp. This case requires this Court to determine whether the Government can cure the unexpected failure of its principal trial witnesses to identify the defendant by offering expert testimony which was never disclosed to defense counsel prior to trial. In addition, if the Court precludes the Government from offering this expert testimony, the Government seeks to rescind an agreement to use a post-arrest statement made by the Defendant for impeachment purposes only, and introduce the more.