5001 search results for query

Citation: 36 F. Supp. 2d 256 | Docket No.: Civ. AMD 97-3793
Status: Published | Citing: 14
Summary: 36 F. Supp. In the meantime, as the 1997-98 school year drew near, Thomas notified the Board that *258 she would be seeking reimbursement for a private placement for Colin for the upcoming school year, but she did not actually assert a claim for reimbursement. Thus, as of the filing of the Board's administrative action, Colin was enrolled in private school in Pennsylvania and Thomas had not yet instituted a claim for reimbursement under state or federal law. Accordingly, since the gravamen of more.

Citation: 979 F. Supp. 360 | Docket No.: Civil No. Y-96-762
Status: Published | Citing: 19
Summary: 979 F. Supp. BG&E urges the cost of restoring the property is grossly disproportionate in light of the low value of Clipper's property ($1,230,000 as estimated by Lexington's experts), and of the relatively small diminution in value of Clipper's property resulting from the fire ($460,000 by Lexington's estimate, $100,710 by BG&E's estimate). General Cigar Co. v. Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Co., 323 F. Supp. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 485 F.2d 78, 84 (4th Cir.1973); more.

Citation: 158 F. Supp. 2d 631 | Docket No.: Civ. PJM 99-3439
Status: Published | Citing: 11
Summary: 158 F. Supp. Silver Hill Station Limited Partnership (Siena)[1] has sued HSA/Wexford Bancgroup, LLC (Wexford) for negligence and negligent misrepresentation in connection with a failed loan application Siena submitted to Wexford. The loan application contained the following proviso: Applicant acknowledges and agrees that the foregoing terms are preliminary and, if lender accepts this Application and thereafter issues to Applicant a Loan Commitment, the terms and conditions of the Loan set forth more.

Citation: 479 F. Supp. 1247 | Docket No.: Crim. No. K-79-054
Status: Published | Citing: 48
Summary: 479 F. Supp. The fundamental principles that give meaning and shape to that Sixth Amendment right were set forth by Judge Carter in Skinner v. Cardwell, 564 F.2d 1381, 1388-89 (9th Cir. 1940); United States v. Harris, 501 F.2d 1 (9 Cir. United States v. Trejo, 501 F.2d 138 (9 Cir. 1974); Enciso v. United States, 370 F.2d 749, 751 (9 Cir. However, in a federal criminal trial, there was and is a need to balance, on the one hand, Brown's *1254 interest in receiving a fair trial—including the more.

Citation: 31 F. Supp. 964 | Docket No.: 2353
Status: Published | Citing: 16
Summary: 31 F. Supp. 1082; The Henry W. Breyer, D.C.Md.1927, 17 F.2d 423, 427; The Emma Giles, D.C., 15 F. Supp. This rudder was ordered November 1937, built thereafter and ready for delivery to the Eastern Shore before the making of the mortgage but delivery was delayed at the request and for the convenience of the ship owner and the rudder was not actually installed on the ship until August 16, 1938, after the making of the mortgage; (d) claim for $11 for work on the Piankatank on March 31, 1938. 97; more.

Citation: 144 F. Supp. 860 | Docket No.: Civ. No. 7971
Status: Published | Citing: 10
Summary: 144 F. Supp. This action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., arises out of a collision between an automobile driven by Charles Andrew Ries, an employee of the government, on government business, and an automobile driven by the plaintiff Charles Zaccari, in which his daughter, the infant plaintiff Patricia Ann Zaccari, 6½ years old at the time of the accident, was a passenger. The issues are: (1) whether the collision was caused by negligence on the part of more.

Citation: 322 F. Supp. 645 | Docket No.: Civ. No. 70-1087-K
Status: Published | Citing: 55
Summary: 322 F. Supp. 645 (1971) Ruth WHEELER a/k/a Ruth Fish v. ADAMS COMPANY, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, Honorable Carl W. Bacharach, Associate Judge, People's Court of Baltimore City, J. Jerome Butler, Chief Constable, People's Court of Baltimore City, Honorable William T. Tippett, Jr., Chief Judge, People's Court of Baltimore City, State of Maryland. In issue in this case are (1) the validity under the Federal Constitution of the replevin procedures of the People's Court of Baltimore City,[1] more.

Citation: 369 F. Supp. 2d 646 | Docket No.: CIV.A.JFM-05-423
Status: Published | Citing: 6
Summary: 369 F. Supp. On February 10, 2005, Petitioner Donald Spriggs filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus application attacking his conviction for larceny entered against him in 1974 by what is now known as the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland.

Citation: 766 F. Supp. 405 | Docket No.: Civ. A. Nos. R-88-2933, R-89-2870
Status: Published | Citing: 22
Summary: 766 F. Supp. Co., 323 F. Supp. U.S. v. Marisol, Inc., 725 F. Supp. 1988); Retirement Community Developers, Inc. v. Merine, 713 F. Supp. See United States v. Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp., 872 F.2d 1373 (8th Cir.1989); New York v. Shore Realty Corp., 759 F.2d 1032 (2nd Cir.1985). Accordingly, in U.S. v. Conservation Chemical Co., 619 F. Supp. The court in Marisol, supra, also held that § 107 does not require "any allegation or proof of an imminent and substantial endangerment to public more.

Citation: 983 F. Supp. 640 | Docket No.: CIV. Y-96-4037
Status: Published | Citing: 35
Summary: 983 F. Supp. Defendants Council of Unit Owners-Hawaiian Village Condominiums, Inc. ("the Council") and K & W Management, Inc. ("K & W") seek summary judgment on the affirmative defense of waiver. Plaintiff responds that the Council's bylaws do not unequivocally express an intent to limit liability for its negligence; that the limitation of liability is void as against public policy; that K & W is not derivatively immune from suit as the Council's agent; and that the Defendants have waived their more.

Citation: 200 F. Supp. 605 | Docket No.: Civ. A. Nos. 10418, 11084
Status: Published | Citing: 14
Summary: 200 F. Supp. *606 John F. King, Anderson, Barnes, Coe & King, Baltimore, Md., Dwight B. Galt, Washington, D. C., of Counsel, for Fletcher Hanks, Jr. Fletcher Hanks, Jr. is the owner of United States Patent to Heden No. 2,288,701, "Shell Food Gathering Apparatus," and United States Patent to Hanks No. 2,672,700, "Shellfish Harvesting Machine." Hanks filed suit against Harrison Ross, William J. Roe, Jr., Roland H. Gernert, William Wyatt, Wesley Thompson, Garrett Ruth and Orem Lowery for more.

Citation: 458 F. Supp. 764 | Docket No.: Civ. No. H-76-20
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: 458 F. Supp. Subsequently, the Joint Venture entered into a sale-and-leaseback arrangement with the plaintiff here, American Industrial Leasing Company (hereinafter "AIL"), a West Virginia corporation. In its amended complaint, AIL asserts that the defendants Law, LeCocq, Dixon and Meeks breached the covenant of general warranty contained in the deed dated November 1, 1966 whereby AIL acquired title to the property.The original complaint in the earlier case asserted a cause of action based on a more.

Citation: 515 F. Supp. 977 | Docket No.: Civ. No. JH-81-946
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 515 F. Supp. 977 (1981) AMERICAN BAKERIES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GOURMET BAKERS, INC. and Peter R. Grimm, Defendants. American supplies breads, rolls, doughnuts and other bakery products to customers in its metropolitan New York market area. American's customers include retail stores, institutions (e. g., hospitals and prisons), and Burger King, Gino's and Rustler restaurants. The plaintiff sells fresh bakery goods to its retail customers for resale under American's various brand names or under more.

Citation: 802 F. Supp. 1325 | Docket No.: Civ. Nos. JH-91-2607, JH-91-2695
Status: Published | Citing: 47
Summary: 802 F. Supp. Bryson F. Popham, Richard T. Colaresi, and Colaresi & Popham, Chartered, Annapolis, Md., for plaintiffs City of Annapolis and Don Wolfrey (Civil No. The appropriate role of this Court in reviewing the decision to build the planned bridge under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act and the National Historic Preservation Act is to decide whether the determinations that were made by the Defendants were "arbitrary, more.

Citation: 343 F. Supp. 487 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 21484
Status: Published | Citing: 6
Summary: 343 F. Supp. This case was commenced by a complaint and a motion for preliminary and permanent injunctions filed December 3, 1969, by the parent plaintiffs on behalf of the infant plaintiffs, all students in the Montgomery County school system, by which relief was sought against the defendant Montgomery County Board of Education, its members and officers [County Board] and the Maryland State Board of Education. The complaint alleged that certain policies and regulations of the County Board, as more.

Citation: 54 F. Supp. 151 | Docket No.: 2623
Status: Published | Citing: 10
Summary: 54 F. Supp. In this case, the libellant, as widow and the declared beneficiary of her deceased husband, Philip Gadsden, is seeking to recover $5,000 on a seaman's war risk insurance policy. As no evidence was offered to show any liability on the War Shipping Administration or A. H. Bull & Company, the case will be considered only as against the United States. The principles governing the admissibility of such evidence were fully stated in this Circuit by Judge John J. Parker in Chesapeake & O. more.

Citation: 222 F. Supp. 175 | Docket No.: Civ. A. No. 12996
Status: Published | Citing: 11
Summary: 222 F. Supp. About three weeks after Monaco was notified by the Corps of Engineers to proceed, it issued a purchase order to Durant to "furnish all underground conduit, accessories and necessary fittings for a complete installation as required by the project plans and specifications and all addenda," as required by the contract. The materials were sold to Durant f. o. b. Gulfport, Mississippi, and were to be shipped to Monaco at Andrew Field. Gulfport's theory of the case is that Durant was a more.

Citation: 218 F. Supp. 2d 769 | Docket No.: CIV.CCB-00-2609
Status: Published | Citing: 12
Summary: 218 F. Supp. Paul F. Strain, Christian L. Gaarder, Venable Baetjer and Howard LLP, Baltimore, MD, M King Hill, III, Venable Baetjer and Howard LLP, Towson, MD, Laura Owens, Jane Fugate Thorpe, Scott Elder, Alston and Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. Claiming that his use of a wireless handheld telephone manufactured by Motorola caused his brain cancer, Dr. Christopher Newman and his wife filed a multi-count complaint against numerous defendants in Baltimore City Circuit more.