Summary:
956 F.2d 1174 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
5 F.3d 1502 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential
United States Court of AppeaIs
for the FederaI Circuit
APPLE INC.,
Appellcmt,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee, ' _
AND
HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,` INC.,
In,teruenors.
Summary:
6 F.3d 1573 39 Cont.Cas.Fed. 1 The United States Court of Federal Claims determined that Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. (SKI) did not show that the United States Navy took private property for public purposes without just compensation. Under the subcontract, the JV promised to supply all construction materials, while SKI promised to provide all necessary tools, equipment, and labor. 4 The JV's contract with the Navy, and SKI's subcontract with the JV, authorized construction of temporary buildings for s......read
more.
Summary:
389 F.3d 1233 Ken A. STOUT, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Raymond W. Angelo, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. 1 Ken A. Stout ("Stout") appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") dismissing his appeal as untimely filed, without a showing of good cause for the sixty-eight-day delay in filing. 3 Stout filed his appeal with the Board on December 28, 2002.1 On......read
more.
Summary:
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. DECISION
Sandra D. Robinson petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems
Protection Board (“Board”) that sustained the action of the Department of the Treasury
(“agency”) suspending her for thirty days from her position as a Contact Representative
GS-0962-8 in the Internal Revenue Service’s downtown Houston, Texas office.
Summary:
61 F.3d 918 Salt Lake Brine Shrimp, Inc. v. Sanders Brine Shrimp Co.; Sanders Brine Shrimp Company v. San Francisco Bay Brand, Inc.d NO. 94-1438 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Summary:
769 F.2d 764 226 U.S.P.Q. 865 In re LOEW'S THEATRES, INC. Further, the examining attorney believed that the evidence of tobacco production in Durango established a prima facie case that there would be a goods/place association by the public, as required for a rejection under Sec. 2(e), citing In re Nantucket, Inc., 677 F.2d 95, 213 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 889 (CCPA 1982). 778, 107 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 362 (1955) (DUTCH and DUTCH BOY for paint); Hyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc., 93 U.S.P.Q. (......read
more.
Summary:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
DECISION
Darien Wilson petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems
Protection Board (“Board”) that sustained the action of the Department of Homeland
Security (“DHS” or “Agency”), removing him from his position for lack of candor and for
filing inaccurate travel charges. On April 2, 2008, the
administrative j......read
more.
Summary:
974 F.2d 1326 Jennie IACONO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. The Administrative Judge affirmed the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) decision that denied Iacono's application for a survivor annuity. In order to elect benefits under the Spouse Equity Act, Iacono had to meet the following criteria: 6 (ii) the former spouse was married to the employee ... for at least ten years during periods of creditable service ...; 7 (iii) the former spouse has not remarried befo......read
more.
Summary:
232 F.3d 1363 (Fed. 1 Kenneth R. Burkhardt seeks review of the final decision of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals1 holding that it did not have jurisdiction over an application for costs and fees, submitted under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). 400 (1998), aff'd, 215 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 637 (Fed. (internal quotations omitted); Music Square Church v. United States, 218 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. To support this argument, Burkhardt cites United States v. 87......read
more.
Summary:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MICHAEL L. SHILL, SR.,
Claimant-Appellant
v.
DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Respondent-Appellee
______________________
2017-2008
______________________
Appeal from the United States Co......read
more.
Summary:
827 F.2d 729 3 U.S.P.Q.2d 1762 MGA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and LaSalle Machine Tool, Inc., Defendants- Appellees. 1 MGA, Inc. (MGA) appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Docket No. 83CV2642DT, dismissing MGA's patent infringement suit against General Motors Corporation (GM). BACKGROUND 2 In 1979, MGA and LaSalle Tool executed an agreement, effective January 1, 1979, which included a paid-up license and release unde......read
more.
Summary:
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
NESTLE USA, INC.,
Appellant
v.
STEUBEN FOODS, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2017-1193
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. Nestlé USA, Inc. appeals fr......read
more.
Summary:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
DAVID A. TROPP,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
V.
CONAIR CORPORATION, L.C. INDUSTRIES, LLC,
MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC, SAMSONITE
CORPORATI()N, TRAVELPRO INTERNATIONAL
INC., AND TRG ACCESSORIES, LLC,
Defendants-Appellants,
AND
BRIGGS & RILEY TRAVELWARE LLC,
Defendant-Appellant,
AND
EAGLE CREEK, A DIVISION OF VF OUTDOOR,
INC., BROOKSTONE COMPANY, INC., AND
BROOKSTONE STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellants,
AND
DELSEY......read
more.
Summary:
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2018-1206
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in No. 1:14-cv-00061-RWG, Senior Judge Ric......read
more.