La Vada A. Newton v. Office of Personnel Management, 956 F.2d 1174 (1992) (Docket No.: 92-3003)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: curiam, circuit, cited, rule, court, citable, local, employed, opinion, appeals, rendered, designated, judgment, precedent, nonprecedential, federal, opinions, orders, judges, order,

Summary: 956 F.2d 1174 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.

Calloway v. Shinseki (2013) (Docket No.: 14-7007)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: 11, veterans, mandate, o’toole, appellee, e., no., court, daniel, clerk, appeals, s21, secretary, shinseki, 2850, claims, federal, october, issued, affairs,

Summary: Case: 14-7007 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

William D. Matthews v. United States Postal Service, 5 F.3d 1502 (1993) (Docket No.: 92-3651)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: curiam, circuit, newman, rule, court, local, states, senior, appeals, 47.6, rendered, precedent, service, nonprecedential, federal, opinions, orders, judge, postal, bennett,

Summary: 5 F.3d 1502 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission (2012) (Docket No.: 2012-1125)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: date, cc, cl.erk, esq., united, 2012, e., hoflbalv, appeal, court, internationa1trade, marcus, states, clerk, horba1y, 1125, jan, sernel, 0n, 10,

Summary: NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit APPLE INC., Appellcmt, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, ' _ AND HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,` INC., In,teruenors.

Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. United States, 795 F.2d 1010 (1986) (Docket No.: 85-2090)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: u.s., 2090, circuit, united, kirchdorfer, f., 1010, skip, court, states, appeals, cl.ct, 2d, 795, v., federal, remanded, 85, reversed, 4/4/86,

Summary: 795 F.2d 1010 Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. U.S. 85-2090 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. United States, 6 F.3d 1573 (1993) (Docket No.: 93-5004)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 24

Keywords: owner, contractor, temporary, completion, access, maintain, contract, fundamental, warehouse, jv, tools, remove, ski, controlled, lien, removed, materials, interest, property, construction,

Summary: 6 F.3d 1573 39 Cont.Cas.Fed. 1 The United States Court of Federal Claims determined that Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. (SKI) did not show that the United States Navy took private property for public purposes without just compensation. Under the subcontract, the JV promised to supply all construction materials, while SKI promised to provide all necessary tools, equipment, and labor. 4 The JV's contract with the Navy, and SKI's subcontract with the JV, authorized construction of temporary buildings for s......read more.

Ken A. Stout v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 389 F.3d 1233 (2004) (Docket No.: 04-3127)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 3

Keywords: request, november, period, filed, stout, aj, appeal, explained, good, filing, requested, file, timeliness, timely, removal, hearing, december, deadline, showing, board,

Summary: 389 F.3d 1233 Ken A. STOUT, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Raymond W. Angelo, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. 1 Ken A. Stout ("Stout") appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") dismissing his appeal as untimely filed, without a showing of good cause for the sixty-eight-day delay in filing. 3 Stout filed his appeal with the Board on December 28, 2002.1 On......read more.

Robinson v. Dept. Of Treasury (2005) (Docket No.: 2005-3010)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 7

Keywords: sustaining, reopened, decision, agency, robinson, ms., procedural, failed, appeal, error, sustained, unwarranted, april, noted, final, ’s, action, board, suspension, case,

Summary: NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. DECISION Sandra D. Robinson petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) that sustained the action of the Department of the Treasury (“agency”) suspending her for thirty days from her position as a Contact Representative GS-0962-8 in the Internal Revenue Service’s downtown Houston, Texas office.

Ecsi International, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Global (2013) (Docket No.: 13-1134)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: considers, transferred, circuit, decision, limited, united, maryland, jurisdiction, appeal, court, forwarded, appeals, horbaly, jan, jersey, nonprecedential, district, federal, directing, order,

Summary: Case: 13-1134 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Salt Lake Brine Shrimp, Inc. v. Sanders Brine Shrimp Co. Sanders Brine Shrimp Company v. San Francisco Bay Brand, Inc. D, 61 F.3d 918 (1995) (Docket No.: 94-1438)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: francisco, san, shrimp, circuit, salt, patent, united, brine, no., court, sanders, states, appeals, v., federal, company, bay, 94, brand, 1438,

Summary: 61 F.3d 918 Salt Lake Brine Shrimp, Inc. v. Sanders Brine Shrimp Co.; Sanders Brine Shrimp Company v. San Francisco Bay Brand, Inc.d NO. 94-1438 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

In Re Loew's Theatres, Inc, 769 F.2d 764 (1985) (Docket No.: 85-888)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | cited by: 10 Primary Sources | citing: 21

Keywords: lti, evidence, refused, applied, sec., goods, nantucket, commerce, primarily, applicant, generally, geographic, distinctive, public, registration, tobacco, place, durango, durangos, mark,

Summary: 769 F.2d 764 226 U.S.P.Q. 865 In re LOEW'S THEATRES, INC. Further, the examining attorney believed that the evidence of tobacco production in Durango established a prima facie case that there would be a goods/place association by the public, as required for a rejection under Sec. 2(e), citing In re Nantucket, Inc., 677 F.2d 95, 213 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 889 (CCPA 1982). 778, 107 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 362 (1955) (DUTCH and DUTCH BOY for paint); Hyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc., 93 U.S.P.Q. (......read more.

Wilson v. Dept. Of Homeland Security (2009) (Docket No.: 2008-3356)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 6

Keywords: ondocin, agency, decision, penalty, mr., dallarosa, sustained, allegedly, airport, 2008, arrived, improperly, charges, september, wilson, selby, statement, removal, ’s, board,

Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board  NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. DECISION Darien Wilson petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) that sustained the action of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS” or “Agency”), removing him from his position for lack of candor and for filing inaccurate travel charges. On April 2, 2008, the administrative j......read more.

Lazerano v. DVA (2009) (Docket No.: 2009-7133)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: var, lazerano_v, listener, media, dva.pdf, 2009/12/18, error, court, directory, pdf, file, assets, alert, www, open,

Summary: Error: Couldn't open file '/var/www/court-listener/alert/assets/media/pdf/2009/12/18/Lazerano_v.

Jennie Iacono v. Office of Personnel Management, 974 F.2d 1326 (1992) (Docket No.: 92-3096)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 7

Keywords: benefits, entitled, argued, fifty, office, employee, annuity, equity, spouse, petitioner, survivor, application, meet, iacono, federal, remarried, files, deadline, married, case,

Summary: 974 F.2d 1326 Jennie IACONO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. The Administrative Judge affirmed the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) decision that denied Iacono's application for a survivor annuity. In order to elect benefits under the Spouse Equity Act, Iacono had to meet the following criteria: 6 (ii) the former spouse was married to the employee ... for at least ten years during periods of creditable service ...; 7 (iii) the former spouse has not remarried befo......read more.

Kenneth R. Burkhardt, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 232 F.3d 1363 (2000) (Docket No.: 99-7034)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 6

Keywords: fees, concluded, jurisdiction, dismissed, language, court, lacked, appeals, noted, award, interpretation, review, interpret, claims, power, eaja, interpreted, burkhardt, potential, case,

Summary: 232 F.3d 1363 (Fed. 1 Kenneth R. Burkhardt seeks review of the final decision of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals1 holding that it did not have jurisdiction over an application for costs and fees, submitted under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). 400 (1998), aff'd, 215 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 637 (Fed. (internal quotations omitted); Music Square Church v. United States, 218 F.3d 1367, 1370 (Fed. To support this argument, Burkhardt cites United States v. 87......read more.

Shill v. Shulkin (2017) (Docket No.: 17-2008)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 2

Keywords: ordered, veterans, agreement, notified, mr., failed, court, petitioner, appeals, extraordinary, secretary, mandamus, petition, claims, december, ’s, relief, respond, prevented, affairs,

Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MICHAEL L. SHILL, SR., Claimant-Appellant v. DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2017-2008 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Co......read more.

Mga, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and Lasalle MacHine Tool, Inc., Defendants, 827 F.2d 729 (1987) (Docket No.: 87-1015)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 24

Keywords: kessler, patent, law, michigan, united, gm, mga, accused, courts, lasalle, court, eldred, judgment, district, federal, v., state, suit, infringement, case,

Summary: 827 F.2d 729 3 U.S.P.Q.2d 1762 MGA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and LaSalle Machine Tool, Inc., Defendants- Appellees. 1 MGA, Inc. (MGA) appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Docket No. 83CV2642DT, dismissing MGA's patent infringement suit against General Motors Corporation (GM). BACKGROUND 2 In 1979, MGA and LaSalle Tool executed an agreement, effective January 1, 1979, which included a paid-up license and release unde......read more.

Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc. (2018) (Docket No.: 17-1193)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 2

Keywords: aseptically, col., similar, fda, product, patent, separate, bottles, packaging, denotes, aseptic, sterilized, specifications, processed, filling, related, refer, detailed, construe, processing,

Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NESTLE USA, INC., Appellant v. STEUBEN FOODS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2017-1193 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. Nestlé USA, Inc. appeals fr......read more.

Tropp v. Conair Corp. (2012) (Docket No.: 2012-1337)

Unpublished Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit

Keywords: llc, defendants, esq., briggs, tropp, appellant, tumi, ebags, a., wordlock, defendant, outpac, luggage, appellants, eagle, v., ri1ey, delsey, david, riley,

Summary: NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit DAVID A. TROPP, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. CONAIR CORPORATION, L.C. INDUSTRIES, LLC, MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC, SAMSONITE CORPORATI()N, TRAVELPRO INTERNATIONAL INC., AND TRG ACCESSORIES, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, AND BRIGGS & RILEY TRAVELWARE LLC, Defendant-Appellant, AND EAGLE CREEK, A DIVISION OF VF OUTDOOR, INC., BROOKSTONE COMPANY, INC., AND BROOKSTONE STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellants, AND DELSEY......read more.

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United States (2019) (Docket No.: 18-1206)

Published Opinion | Federal Appellate, Federal, | Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit | citing: 13

Keywords: door, knob, heading, subject, locking, knobs, operated, classification, court, locks, home, fall, htsus, lock, bolt, subheading, articles, key, doorknobs, gri,

Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2018-1206 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:14-cv-00061-RWG, Senior Judge Ric......read more.