Summary:
39 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
42 F.3d 1408 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of AppeaIs
for the FederaI Circuit
BENJAMIN CUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
UNITED STATES,
Defendcmt-Appellee.
Summary:
364 F.3d 1321 Loran L. HAYSLIP, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Cross-Appellant. 1 Loran L. Hayslip appeals an order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims remanding his claim for service-connected disability compensation to the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs cross-appeals the remand order claiming that it is an improper retroactive application of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act ("VCAA"), P......read more.
Summary:
347 F.3d 1299 SHU-HUI CHEN and Vittorio Farina, Appellants, v. Herve BOUCHARD, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain Commercon, Appellees. 1 Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina (collectively "Chen") appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarding judgment to appellees Hervé Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain Commerçon (collectively "Bouchard"), the senior party, in Interference No. 103,675. Chen v. Bouchard, I......read more.
Summary:
64 F.3d 644 40 Cont.Cas.Fed. On April 30, 1992, the Board issued a decision sustaining PRC's protest on the ground that, in awarding the contract to EDS, the Air Force had engaged in prohibited practices which were prejudicial to PRC.2 4 On June 1, 1992, PRC timely filed its Motion for Costs, under 40 U.S.C. Sec. 759(f)(5)(C).3 In its motion, PRC sought reimbursement for the costs of prosecuting the protest and preparing its contract proposal.4 On August 28, 1992, EDS appealed the Board's underl......read more.
Summary:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Cou1“c of AppeaIs
for the FederaI Circuit
KURT CHADWELL,
Petiti0ner, _
V.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent,
AND
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, `
Intervenor.
Summary:
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ERIC CERWONKA,
Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent
______________________
2018-1398
______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. BORISLAV KUSHNIR, Commercial Litigation Branch,
Civil D......read more.
Summary:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MARY REEVES,
Claimant-Appellant
v.
ROBERT A. MCDONALD,
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent-Appellee
______________________
2014-7032
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of ......read more.
Summary:
975 F.2d 869 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
03-1541, 04-1137, -1213
EVIDENT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-
Appellant,
and
PEROXYDENT GROUP,
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
......read more.
Summary:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Summary:
862 F.2d 1558 Angel RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 1 Angel Rodriguez (Rodriguez) appeals from an order of the United States Claims Court, 13 Cl.Ct. Before us, Rodriguez and the government say the district court erred in its liability decision, when it held the exception in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2680(c) applicable to Rodriguez' SIAA and FTCA claims, because that holding was based on an erroneous reading of Williams and is in apparent conflict with the subsequently decided B & F Trawlers, Inc. v. Uni......read more.
Summary:
923 F.2d 870 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
884 F.2d 1398 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.
Summary:
370 F.3d 1108 ALTX, INC., DMV Stainless Usa, Inc., Salem Tube, Inc., Sandvik Steel Co., and Pennsylvania Extruded Tube Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and American Extruded Products Corp. and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES and United States International Trade Commission, Defendants-Appellees, and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., Nippon Steel Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, Kobe Steel Ltd., Sanyo Special Steel Company, and NKK Corporation (now ......read more.