Clear

10000 search results for query


Docket No.: 2010-3002
Status: Unpublished
Summary: Error: Couldn't open file '/var/www/court-listener/alert/assets/media/pdf/2009/11/25/Eisele_v.


Citation: 39 F.3d 1195 | Docket No.: 94-3320
Status: Unpublished | Citing: 1
Summary: 39 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.




Citation: 802 F.2d 469 | Docket No.: 86-993
Status: Published
Summary: 802 F.2d 469 Jackson v. O.P.M. 86-993 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.


Citation: 42 F.3d 1408 | Docket No.: 95-3033
Status: Unpublished
Summary: 42 F.3d 1408 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.


Docket No.: 2012-5052
Status: Unpublished
Summary: NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit BENJAMIN CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defendcmt-Appellee.


Citation: 364 F.3d 1321 | Docket No.: 03-7101
Status: Published | Citing: 11
Summary: 364 F.3d 1321 Loran L. HAYSLIP, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Cross-Appellant. 1 Loran L. Hayslip appeals an order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims remanding his claim for service-connected disability compensation to the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs cross-appeals the remand order claiming that it is an improper retroactive application of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act ("VCAA"), P......read more.




Citation: 347 F.3d 1299 | Docket No.: 03-1037
Status: Published | Citing: 19
Summary: 347 F.3d 1299 SHU-HUI CHEN and Vittorio Farina, Appellants, v. Herve BOUCHARD, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain Commercon, Appellees. 1 Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina (collectively "Chen") appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarding judgment to appellees Hervé Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain Commerçon (collectively "Bouchard"), the senior party, in Interference No. 103,675. Chen v. Bouchard, I......read more.


Citation: 64 F.3d 644 | Docket No.: 94-1481
Status: Published | Citing: 9
Summary: 64 F.3d 644 40 Cont.Cas.Fed. On April 30, 1992, the Board issued a decision sustaining PRC's protest on the ground that, in awarding the contract to EDS, the Air Force had engaged in prohibited practices which were prejudicial to PRC.2 4 On June 1, 1992, PRC timely filed its Motion for Costs, under 40 U.S.C. Sec. 759(f)(5)(C).3 In its motion, PRC sought reimbursement for the costs of prosecuting the protest and preparing its contract proposal.4 On August 28, 1992, EDS appealed the Board's underl......read more.


Docket No.: 2011-3174
Status: Unpublished
Summary: NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Cou1“c of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit KURT CHADWELL, Petiti0ner, _ V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, AND OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, ` Intervenor.


Docket No.: 18-1398
Status: Published | Citing: 23
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ERIC CERWONKA, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________ 2018-1398 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. BORISLAV KUSHNIR, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil D......read more.


Docket No.: 14-7032
Status: Unpublished | Citing: 12
Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MARY REEVES, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2014-7032 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of ......read more.


Citation: 975 F.2d 869 | Docket No.: 92-3189
Status: Unpublished
Summary: 975 F.2d 869 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.


Docket No.: 2003-1541
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1541, 04-1137, -1213 EVIDENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant- Appellant, and PEROXYDENT GROUP, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, ......read more.


Docket No.: 2007-3151
Status: Unpublished | Citing: 3
Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Citation: 862 F.2d 1558 | Docket No.: 88-1122
Status: Published | Citing: 9
Summary: 862 F.2d 1558 Angel RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 1 Angel Rodriguez (Rodriguez) appeals from an order of the United States Claims Court, 13 Cl.Ct. Before us, Rodriguez and the government say the district court erred in its liability decision, when it held the exception in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2680(c) applicable to Rodriguez' SIAA and FTCA claims, because that holding was based on an erroneous reading of Williams and is in apparent conflict with the subsequently decided B & F Trawlers, Inc. v. Uni......read more.


Citation: 923 F.2d 870 | Docket No.: 90-3415
Status: Unpublished
Summary: 923 F.2d 870 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.


Citation: 884 F.2d 1398 | Docket No.: 89-3210
Status: Unpublished
Summary: 884 F.2d 1398 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent.


Citation: 370 F.3d 1108 | Docket No.: 03-1320
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 370 F.3d 1108 ALTX, INC., DMV Stainless Usa, Inc., Salem Tube, Inc., Sandvik Steel Co., and Pennsylvania Extruded Tube Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and American Extruded Products Corp. and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES and United States International Trade Commission, Defendants-Appellees, and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., Nippon Steel Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, Kobe Steel Ltd., Sanyo Special Steel Company, and NKK Corporation (now ......read more.