Clear

1294 search results for query *


Summary: IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Jonathan G. SCALO, Private (E-1) U.S. Army, Appellant No. 04-0250 Crim. 2 United States v. Scalo, No. 04-0250/AR I. BACKGROUND As we observed in United States v. Finster, 51 M.J. 185, 186 (C.A.A.F. 1999): One of th......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Christine N. THOMPSON, Private U.S. Army, Appellant No. 09-0145 Crim. United States 2 United States v. Thompson, No. 09-0145/AR v. Thompson, No. 3 United States v. Thompson, No. 09-0145/AR • August 18, 2006: Appellant submits demand for speedy trial under Article 10, ......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Jordan M. PETERS, Specialist U.S. Army, Appellant No. 14-0289 Crim. United States v. Peters, No. 14-0289/AR Chief Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. 2 United States v. Peters, No. 14-0289/AR challenge for cause against Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Cook. LTC Cook was aware that CPT Krupa was involved with thi......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Richard J. ASHBY, Captain U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant No. 08-0770 Crim. United States v. Ashby, No. 08-0770/MC Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.1 Appellant, Captain (Capt.) Richard J. Ashby, United States Marine Corps Reserve, was the pilot of an EA-6B Prowler aircraft conducting a training mission ......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Walter S. COLEMAN, Specialist U.S. Army Appellant No. 13-0007 Crim. United States v. Coleman, No. 13-0007/AR Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten 2 United States v. Coleman, No. 13-0007/AR ......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Dustin M. HART, Airman First Class U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 07-0247 Crim. 3 United States v. Hart, No. 07-0247/AF That same day, Hart’s section commander cleared Hart for final outprocessing.2 Two days later, the initial calculation of Hart’s separation pay was entered into the computer system of the Defense Finance and Acc......read more.


Summary: This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Derrick L. DINGER, Gunnery Sergeant (Ret.) United States v. Dinger, No. 17-0510/MC Opinion of the Court I. Background Appellant served on acti......read more.


Summary: U.S. v. Huberty UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Paul G. HUBERTY, Lieutenant Colonel U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 99-0778 Crim. On August 12-22, 1996, Lieutenant Colonel Paul G. Huberty was convicted by officer members of consensual sodomy, fondling his genitals in a public area, indecent acts, and adultery, in violation of Articles 125, 133, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 925, 933, and 934. On December 1, 1999, we granted review of the following issues: I WHETHER THE AIR FORCE ......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Javier CENDEJAS, Staff Sergeant U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 04-0428 Crim. United States v. Cendejas, No. 04-0428/AF Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. The military judge did not make any finding of 2 United States v. Cendejas, No. 04-0428/AF fact that actual children wer......read more.


Summary: U.S. v. Clemente United States, Appellee v. Rogelio P. CLEMENTE, Technical Sergeant U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 97-0978 Crim. United States v. Rust, 41 M.J. 472, 478 (1995); United States v. Zakaria, 38 M.J. 280, 283 (CMA 1993).


Summary: This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Justin D. STEEN, Boatswain’s Mate Third Class United States Coast Guard, Appellant No. 20-0206 Crim. The United States Coast Guard Court of Crimin......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Ted C. SQUIRE, Sergeant First Class U.S. Army, Appellant No. 13-0061 Crim. United States v. Squire, No. 13-0061/AR Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. 2 United States v. Squire, No. 13-0061/AR hearsay. 3 United States v. Squire, No. 13-0061/AR shirt, panties, and sleep pants when she went to bed the nigh......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Charles A. Graner Jr., Specialist U.S. Army, Appellant No. 09-0432 Crim. Appellant’s actions that day included: ripping the pants off a detainee and having Specialist Sabrina Harman write “I’m a rapeist [sic]” on the detainee’s leg, then punching the detainee in the temple so hard that the detainee was knocked unconscio......read more.


Summary: IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Ronald C. ROBERTS, Senior Master Sergeant U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 03-0109 Crim. Appellant Senior Master Sergeant Ronald C. Roberts was convicted in a contested general court-martial of altering a public record, removing a public record, drafting and printing a false Air Force form and m......read more.


Summary: U.S. v. Ayers IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Jeffery L. AYERS, Sr., Staff Sergeant U.S. Army, Appellant No. 99-0944 Crim. No. 9701847 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued April 6, 2000 Decided September 11, 2000 GIERKE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which EFFRON, J., and COX, S.J., joined, and in which CRAWFORD, C.J., joined as to Issues III, IV, and V. CRAWFORD, C.J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting as to Issue I. SULLIVAN, J., fi......read more.


Summary: IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Dathan O. CHISHOLM, Sergeant U.S Army, Appellee No. 03-5003 Crim. 2 United States v. Chisholm, No. 03-5003/AR Pursuant to Article 67(a)(2), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2000), the Judge Advocate General of the Army submitted the case to our Court, certifying......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Bradley K. RHODES, Staff Sergeant U.S. Air Force, Appellant No. 04-0336 Crim. The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the court-martial’s results in an unpublished opinion.4 We granted review to determine whether a Government witness’s pretrial statement implicating Appellant was properly admitted into evid......read more.


Summary: This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Danny L. McPHERSON, Staff Sergeant United States Army, Appellee No. 21-0042 Crim. Following this plain meaning, the United States Army Court......read more.


Summary: This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Dashaun K. HENRY, Sergeant First Class United States Army, Appellee No. 20-0342 Crim. The Army Judge Advocate General then certified the issue t......read more.


Summary: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Evan VELA, Sergeant U.S. Army, Appellant No. 12-0194 Crim. United States v. Vela, No. 12-0194/AR Chief Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. ” A short time later, members of the unit’s Sensitive Site Exploitation (SSE) team arrived to inspect the site while the ......read more.