Clear

10000 search results for query trial court


Summary: {'text': ['TRIAL COURT & others.[1] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. May 5, 1987. August 10, 1987.', 'was properly made to the "nominal chief executive *584 officer" of the Trial Court, in this case the Chief Administrative Justice of the Trial Court.', 'In an action against the Trial Court, the nominal chief executive officer is properly the Chief Administrative Justice of the Trial Court.'], 'title': ['Kinan v. Trial Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['TRIAL COURT JUDGES OF THE FOLLOWING DISTRICTS, Individually\nand in Their Official Capacities; TRIAL COURT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OF\nTHE FOLLOWING DISTRICTS', ', Individually and in Their Official Capacities;\nTRIAL COURT DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, Individually and in Their Official\nCapacities,', 'The original § 1983 complaint alleged that trial court judges, district\nattorneys, and defense attorneys violated Texas criminal defendants’ rights in'], 'title': ['Michael Hurtado v. Trial Court Judges']}


Summary: {'text': ['SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL JUDGE. No. 499P06-4. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 13, 2009. Arthur O. Armstrong, Pro Se. Catherine C.', 'Eagles, Greensboro, for Superior Court Trial Judge. Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Mercedes O. Chut, Greensboro, for UC Lending Corp.', ', Guilford County: Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 13th of July 2009.'], 'title': ['Armstrong v. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL JUDGE']}


Summary: {'text': ['DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL\n COURT.\n\n\n August 18, 2017.', 'Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001), which\nrequires Bishay to "set forth the reasons why review of the\ntrial court decision cannot adequately', 'be obtained on appeal\nfrom any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other\navailable means." 2 The rule does not apply here, as the District'], 'title': ['Bishay v. District Court Department of the Trial Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT.\n\n\n August 18, 2017.', 'Rule 2:21, as\namended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001), which requires a showing that\n"review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be\nobtained on appeal', 'from any final adverse judgment in the trial\ncourt or by other available means."'], 'title': ['Martin v. Superior Court Department of the Trial Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['LAND COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT.\n\n\n August 18, 2017.', 'ruling of the trial court.', 'a final order --\neffectively foreclosing [Bishay] from proceeding further in the\ntrial court and leaving the court with nothing else to do in the\ncase'], 'title': ['Bishay v. Land Court Department of the Trial Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT\n OF THE TRIAL COURT.1\n\n\n\n March 13, 2015\n\n\n\nSupreme Judicial Court, Superintendence', 'Department of the Trial Court were named as the respondents.', 'A motion for a new\ntrial filed in the trial court, and not a petition for general\nsuperintendence relief in this court, is the appropriate remedy.'], 'title': ['Fitzgerald v. District Court Department of the Trial Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['We agree with petitioners that the trial court should not have exercised its jurisdiction by intruding upon the internal affairs of a voluntary private', 'Trial of the matter was set for September 23.', "After the trial, but while the superior court had the matter under submission, the members' ballots were returned and the votes tabulated."], 'title': ['California Trial Lawyers Assn. v. Superior Court']}


Summary: {'text': ['complaint against the Trial Court, the Trial Court was a "defendant" within the meaning of M.C.L. § 49.73.', 'NOTES [1] For ease of reference, the 46th Circuit Trial Court will hereinafter be referred to simply as "the Trial Court."', 'have proceeded through trial to a verdict in favor of the Trial Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Justices\n Plaintiff', 'On reconsideration, we MODIFY\n our order dated January 26, 2006, only in the following respect: We direct the Clerk of\n the Court to place this case', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Justices\n Plaintiff', 'Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the\n foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Justices\n Plaintiff', 'We direct the Clerk\n of the Court to place this case on the April 2006 session calendar for argument and\n submission.', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['We granted leave to appeal to consider this funding dispute between the\n\n46th Circuit Trial Court (hereafter the Trial Court) and two of its three county', 'functions into a\n\nsingle entity known as the 46th Circuit Trial Court.2 The chief judge of the 46th\n\nCircuit Court was appointed the Trial Court’s chief', 'This Court noted that there was no dispute\n\nthat, as found by the trial court, the plaintiff trial court was functioning at a level\n\n“‘satisfactory to'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County']}


Summary: {'text': ['Young, Jr.\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Stephen J.', 'Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the\n foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['687 N.W.2d 296 (2004) 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County. No. 125964. Supreme Court of Michigan. October 1, 2004. SC: 125964, COA: 254179.', 'The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the *297 Court is not persuaded', 'that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n Justices\n\n\n\n\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT,\n\n Plaintiff', 'Counter-Defendant-Appellant, \n\n and\n OTSEGO COUNTY,\n\n Third-Party Defendant. \n\n _________________________________________/ \n\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Justices\n Plaintiff', 'Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the\n foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['Markman,\n Justices\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT,', "for reconsideration of whether the 46th Circuit Trial Court is entitled to recover\n reasonable attorney fees, in light of this Court's decision in 46th", 'Circuit Trial Court v\n Crawford County (Docket No. 128878).'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County']}


Summary: {'text': ['Corrigan\n 46TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Robert P. Young, Jr.', 'AO 1998-5 states that a trial court may not move funds\n between line items absent the prior approval of the funding unit in only two situations, in', 'of the Court.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford Cnty']}


Summary: {'text': ['687 N.W.2d 297 (2004) 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County. Nos. 126846, 126847, 126848, 126849. Supreme Court of Michigan. October 1, 2004.', 'On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2004, and August 2, 2004 decisions of the Court of Appeals, and the application', 'in 46th Circuit Trial Court v.'], 'title': ['46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford County']}