Navigation



10000 search results for query court of appeals for the tenth circuit


All

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 83 F.3d 431 (1996)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 30, 1996. Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. Braun then appealed that dismissal to a Kansas Court of Appeals, which affirmed. The Kansas Supreme Court denied review of the case. He failed to seek review of the state district court dismissal of his habeas petitions by the Kansas Court of Appeals.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 3 F.3d 1398 (1993)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Aug. 31, 1993. Kent Winchester, Albuquerque, NM (Charles E.C. Knight appeals the directed verdict on the tortious interference claim and the denial of his petition for attorneys' fees and costs. Snap-On cross-appeals the denial of its petition for attorneys' fees and costs. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 815 F.2d 617 (1987)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. April 3, 1987. Margie J. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.2. Under Kansas law, for purposes of claim preclusion, Morene Carter and Cynthia Carter Metz were sufficiently in privity in the state court action that the

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 801 F.2d 1210 (1986)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Sept. 17, 1986. Robert N. Miller, U.S. Atty., and F. Joseph Mackey III, Asst. U.S. SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. 1 The United States appeals from three district court orders dismissing without prejudice civil forfeiture the issues for a court deciding a forfeiture claim.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 571 F.2d 1140 (1978)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1977.Decided Jan. 13, 1978.Rehearing Denied March 23, 1978. Judson S. the control of the bankruptcy court. * Of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Washington, D.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 484 F.2d 864 (1973)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 14, 1973.Decided Sept. 17, 1973. Jennie Deden Behles, Albuquerque, N. All of the appeals involve, in one way or another, referee's orders, sustained by the district court, with reference to compensation for the attorney who No order of consolidation was requested or made in the court of appeals.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 441 F.2d 704 (1971)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. March 2, 1971.Rehearings Denied May 20, 1971 and June 9, 1971. Wayne Coulson and Dale M. of costs on these appeals is subject to future court action. The court notes that the 88 appeals have been presented and determined on a consolidated record.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit , 370 F.2d 181 (1966)

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Dec. 9, 1966. William K. Tell, Jr., and William R. may not be ordered. 3 The first petition for review was filed in the Tenth Circuit by Sunray DX Oil Company and other producers. After procedural skirmishes,3 petitions for review of Opinion No. 422 pending in other circuits were transferred to the Tenth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C

Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986 , 955 F.2d 36 (1992)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Feb. 14, 1992. value and shall not be cited, or used by any other court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 429 U.S. 917, 97 S. Ct. 341, 50 L.

Barbara Schwarz v. United States Postal Service, United States Supreme Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit , 996 F.2d 311 (1993)

Barbara SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, United States Supreme Court,United States Court of Appeals for the TenthCircuit, Defendants-Appellees United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 3, 1993. Before TACHA, BALDOCK and KELLY, Circuit Judges. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

Barbara Schwarz v. United States Postal Service, United States Supreme Court, and United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit , 36 F.3d 1105 (1994)

Barbara SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, United States Supreme Court,and United States Court of Appeals for the TenthCircuit United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Sept. 19, 1994. Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges. Schwarz, a pro se litigant, seeks to appeal the district court's ruling denying her request for certified copies of her court file at court expense.

Vacek v. Court of Appeals , vacek-v-court-of-appeals (2009)

Tenth Circuit April 7, 2009 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT DAN VACEK, Plaintiff COURT OF APPEALS, SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO; MICHAEL E.

Jensen v. Utah Court of Appeals , jensen-v-utah-court-of-appeals (2013)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT previously entered by the Utah Court of Appeals. The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He appeals from the dismissal of his petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Kemper v. Colorado Court of Appeals , kemper-v-colorado-court-of-appeals (2013)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT An administrative law judge denied benefits, and the Industrial Claims Appeals Office affirmed, as did the Colorado Court of Appeals. or for its failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission , 337 F.2d 253 (1964)

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Oct. 14, 1964. James J. Flood, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Alfred C. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and on the motion of respondent, Federal Power Commission, to dismiss the petition for review The Court of Appeals therefore erred in failing to dismiss its petition for lack of venue.' 5 The remand to us is for further proceedings

Ficken v. Internal Revenue Service , ficken-v-internal-revenue-service (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit of Appeals Tenth Circuit We REVERSE the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with directions to REMAND this matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent

United States v. Huls , united-states-v-huls (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES Entered for the Court Monroe G.

Tony G. Lovato, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. City of Albuquerque, Robert L. Sanchez, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee , 930 F.2d 34 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 4, 1991. Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, ALDISERT* and LOGAN, Circuit Judges. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation ** This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing

Woodruff v. United States , woodruff-v-united-states (2002)

No. 02-CV-77-B) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; (D. Wyoming) DAVID M. EBEL, Judge, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals; PAUL J. KELLY, Judge, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals; MICHAEL R. Wyoming) Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit; JANE B. HOWELL, Chief Deputy Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit; JEANNE E.

United States v. Menzor , united-states-v-menzor (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee The argument is presented solely for preservation of the issue for potential en banc or Supreme Court review.

Tiscareno v. Anderson , tiscareno-v-anderson (2011)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT April Entered for the Court Carlos F. Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 26, 2011 TENTH CIRCUIT

O'Dell v. United States Gov't , odell-v-united-states-govt (2007)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit O’Dell then appealed that decision to the District Court for the District of Wyoming, which dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. Any appeal from that court’s decision must be made in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1294(1).

Ray v. Bradford , ray-v-bradford (2015)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT The district court adopted the findings and conclusions of the magistrate’s second report, converted the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary However, because Ray brought his suit in a federal court within the Tenth Circuit, Tenth Circuit precedent applies. Cf. Beaudry v. Corr.

Wade v. Hatcher , wade-v-hatcher (1998)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Wade, trustee for creditor Mid State Trust II, appeals from an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit, Entered for the Court John C.

Allred v. Shumaker , allred-v-shumaker (2007)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit No. 2:06-CV-870-TS) of Court, and THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, Defendants-Appellees. prejudice his pro se civil action against the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and Clerk of the Court Elisabeth A.

Vernon Gilstrap, II v. Circle K Corporation , 937 F.2d 616 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 9, 1991. Before LOGAN, SEYMOUR and TACHA, Circuit Judges. We have reviewed the record and read the relevant case law, and we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district court. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

United States v. Arias-Santos , united-states-v-arias-santos (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Santos' appeal of the denial is currently pending with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the present case, Mr. Santos did not move the Tenth Circuit for permission to file his second § 2255 motion in the district court.

Fleet Resources v. Zwick , fleet-resources-v-zwick (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS In so doing, this court makes the following observation: contrary to Zwick’s assertions on appeal, in the Tenth Circuit a creditor need not prove that -2- The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is hereby AFFIRMED

Mark B. Zuckert v. Secretary of Health & Human Services , 937 F.2d 617 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 5, 1991. Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. Zuckert appeals the Secretary's denial of his application for supplemental security income which was affirmed by the district court for the District of We AFFIRM the district court for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Zuckert v.

Smith v. CIR , smith-v-cir (2005)

Smith’s motion and supplemental motion for recusal and disqualification of the entire United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, the United States District for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, several judges of the United States District -3- Courts of Colorado

Kevin Rutherford v. Gary Neet, Attorney General for the State of Colorado, District Court, Court of Appeals, and State Supreme Court , 149 F.3d 1191 (1998)

Kevin RUTHERFORD, Petitioner--Appellant,v.Gary NEET, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,District Court, Court of Appeals, and StateSupreme Court United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 19, 1998. Before ANDERSON, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Colorado Court of Appeals and the Colorado Supreme Court denied certiorari.

United States v. Montes-Lozano , united-states-v-montes-lozano (2000)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS be a fair reading, particularly given the court’s awareness of then-recent Tenth Circuit caselaw deciding that some of the same grounds relied upon it’s all pretty clear from the Tenth Circuit on backpackers.” II R. at 18.

Mendiola v. Ashcroft , mendiola-v-ashcroft (2006)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS M endiola moved for a change of venue from the Tenth Circuit to the Ninth Circuit, asserting that he had no nexus to Colorado and that allowing the case over final orders of removal now lies exclusively in a court of appeals pursuant to a petition for review.

Fuller v. Robinson , fuller-v-robinson (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Proceeding pro se, appellant Claudine Rene Fuller appeals the dismissal of the appeal she filed with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R.

In re: David Novak v. , in-re-david-novak-v (2004)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS David Novak, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of his appeal from a decision of the bankruptcy court for -2- cases before the Tenth Circuit and that the district court had a duty to clear up the confusion.

Bruner v. Champion, et.al. , bruner-v-champion-etal (1998)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and Tenth Circuit protocol, we assume that the district court denied petitioner a certificate of Petitioner filed his § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Adkins v. Marten , adkins-v-marten (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT EBRAHIM Plaintiff Ebrahim Adkins appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil action against the district court judge who denied Plaintiff’s prior

United States v. Mendez , united-states-v-mendez (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT He contends that the vacated panel decision in Cusumano indicated a willingness on the part of “several members” of the Tenth Circuit to hold that a

United States v. Nichols , 374 F.3d 959 (2004)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH The Supreme Court summarily reversed and remanded our decision for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker , 125 S. We requested that the parties file supplemental briefs on the applicability of Booker and subsequent Tenth Circuit cases.

Matrix Ski Corporation, a Texas Corporation v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, Tom Blake, Fred Crowley, George Madsen, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, and Others Yet Unnamed , 932 F.2d 975 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 8, 1991. Before JOHN P. MOORE, SETH and STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. We find no merit whatever in the questions presented for review, and AFFIRM the decision of the district court essentially for the reasons set forth in * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

United-States-V-Pearce , ca10 united-states-v-pearce (2000)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals involving issues relating to Sentencing Guidelines enhancements, constitute a change in However, he did not cite a single case from either the Tenth Circuit or the Supreme Court interpreting the Sentencing Guidelines in his opening brief

Parrin v. Helms , parrin-v-helms (1999)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS The judgment of the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Stephen H.

Sheriff John Lee v. United States , sheriff-john-lee-v-united-states (1997)

Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 1997 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER -3- Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

United States v. Davis , united-states-v-davis (2008)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit He requested the Tenth Circuit pattern jury instruction for self-defense but the district court instead provided the jury with an instruction similar that the Court give just the general Tenth Circuit pattern instruction that I tendered.

Nunn v. Chapman , nunn-v-chapman (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT RAYFEAL R The district court also correctly applied Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit precedent to conclude that Petitioner’s other claims failed on the merits.

United States v. Mora , united-states-v-mora (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 4, Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, We, in turn, remand this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico with instructions to reconsider the sentence in light

United States v. Cox , united-states-v-cox (2005)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Cox acknowledges that, because of the panel ruling in Williams , “he cannot prevail on this issue at the Tenth Circuit panel level, but will ask for -2- The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is therefore

Olayiwola Ogunbiyi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, (United States of America) , 933 F.2d 1019 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 28, 1991. Before LOGAN and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and COOK,* Chief Judge. Dale Cook, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, sitting by designation ** This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing

Smolen v. Hatley , smolen-v-hatley (1999)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Byron White United Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 1999 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Hatley’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order, see Smolen v.

Carl Gene Hacker v. James L. Saffle, Warden, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma , 936 F.2d 583 (1991)

Henry, Attorney Generalof the State of Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6042. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Hacker, a prisoner in the custody of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, appeals the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Western , but also because of a delay incurred when the appellate court remanded the appeal to the trial court for an additional evidentiary hearing.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 83 F.3d 431 (1996)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 30, 1996. Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. Braun then appealed that dismissal to a Kansas Court of Appeals, which affirmed. The Kansas Supreme Court denied review of the case. He failed to seek review of the state district court dismissal of his habeas petitions by the Kansas Court of Appeals.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 3 F.3d 1398 (1993)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Aug. 31, 1993. Kent Winchester, Albuquerque, NM (Charles E.C. Knight appeals the directed verdict on the tortious interference claim and the denial of his petition for attorneys' fees and costs. Snap-On cross-appeals the denial of its petition for attorneys' fees and costs. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 815 F.2d 617 (1987)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. April 3, 1987. Margie J. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.2. Under Kansas law, for purposes of claim preclusion, Morene Carter and Cynthia Carter Metz were sufficiently in privity in the state court action that the

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 801 F.2d 1210 (1986)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Sept. 17, 1986. Robert N. Miller, U.S. Atty., and F. Joseph Mackey III, Asst. U.S. SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. 1 The United States appeals from three district court orders dismissing without prejudice civil forfeiture the issues for a court deciding a forfeiture claim.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 571 F.2d 1140 (1978)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1977.Decided Jan. 13, 1978.Rehearing Denied March 23, 1978. Judson S. the control of the bankruptcy court. * Of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Washington, D.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 484 F.2d 864 (1973)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 14, 1973.Decided Sept. 17, 1973. Jennie Deden Behles, Albuquerque, N. All of the appeals involve, in one way or another, referee's orders, sustained by the district court, with reference to compensation for the attorney who No order of consolidation was requested or made in the court of appeals.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit , 441 F.2d 704 (1971)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. March 2, 1971.Rehearings Denied May 20, 1971 and June 9, 1971. Wayne Coulson and Dale M. of costs on these appeals is subject to future court action. The court notes that the 88 appeals have been presented and determined on a consolidated record.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit , 370 F.2d 181 (1966)

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Dec. 9, 1966. William K. Tell, Jr., and William R. may not be ordered. 3 The first petition for review was filed in the Tenth Circuit by Sunray DX Oil Company and other producers. After procedural skirmishes,3 petitions for review of Opinion No. 422 pending in other circuits were transferred to the Tenth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C

Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986 , 955 F.2d 36 (1992)

United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Feb. 14, 1992. value and shall not be cited, or used by any other court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 429 U.S. 917, 97 S. Ct. 341, 50 L.

Barbara Schwarz v. United States Postal Service, United States Supreme Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit , 996 F.2d 311 (1993)

Barbara SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, United States Supreme Court,United States Court of Appeals for the TenthCircuit, Defendants-Appellees United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 3, 1993. Before TACHA, BALDOCK and KELLY, Circuit Judges. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

Barbara Schwarz v. United States Postal Service, United States Supreme Court, and United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit , 36 F.3d 1105 (1994)

Barbara SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, United States Supreme Court,and United States Court of Appeals for the TenthCircuit United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Sept. 19, 1994. Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges. Schwarz, a pro se litigant, seeks to appeal the district court's ruling denying her request for certified copies of her court file at court expense.

Vacek v. Court of Appeals , vacek-v-court-of-appeals (2009)

Tenth Circuit April 7, 2009 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT DAN VACEK, Plaintiff COURT OF APPEALS, SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO; MICHAEL E.

Jensen v. Utah Court of Appeals , jensen-v-utah-court-of-appeals (2013)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT previously entered by the Utah Court of Appeals. The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He appeals from the dismissal of his petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Kemper v. Colorado Court of Appeals , kemper-v-colorado-court-of-appeals (2013)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT An administrative law judge denied benefits, and the Industrial Claims Appeals Office affirmed, as did the Colorado Court of Appeals. or for its failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission , 337 F.2d 253 (1964)

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. Oct. 14, 1964. James J. Flood, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Alfred C. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and on the motion of respondent, Federal Power Commission, to dismiss the petition for review The Court of Appeals therefore erred in failing to dismiss its petition for lack of venue.' 5 The remand to us is for further proceedings

Ficken v. Internal Revenue Service , ficken-v-internal-revenue-service (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit of Appeals Tenth Circuit We REVERSE the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with directions to REMAND this matter to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent

United States v. Huls , united-states-v-huls (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES Entered for the Court Monroe G.

Tony G. Lovato, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. City of Albuquerque, Robert L. Sanchez, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee , 930 F.2d 34 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 4, 1991. Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, ALDISERT* and LOGAN, Circuit Judges. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation ** This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing

Woodruff v. United States , woodruff-v-united-states (2002)

No. 02-CV-77-B) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; (D. Wyoming) DAVID M. EBEL, Judge, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals; PAUL J. KELLY, Judge, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals; MICHAEL R. Wyoming) Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit; JANE B. HOWELL, Chief Deputy Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit; JEANNE E.

United States v. Menzor , united-states-v-menzor (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee The argument is presented solely for preservation of the issue for potential en banc or Supreme Court review.

Tiscareno v. Anderson , tiscareno-v-anderson (2011)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT April Entered for the Court Carlos F. Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 26, 2011 TENTH CIRCUIT

O'Dell v. United States Gov't , odell-v-united-states-govt (2007)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit O’Dell then appealed that decision to the District Court for the District of Wyoming, which dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. Any appeal from that court’s decision must be made in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1294(1).

Ray v. Bradford , ray-v-bradford (2015)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT The district court adopted the findings and conclusions of the magistrate’s second report, converted the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary However, because Ray brought his suit in a federal court within the Tenth Circuit, Tenth Circuit precedent applies. Cf. Beaudry v. Corr.

Wade v. Hatcher , wade-v-hatcher (1998)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Wade, trustee for creditor Mid State Trust II, appeals from an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit, Entered for the Court John C.

Allred v. Shumaker , allred-v-shumaker (2007)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit No. 2:06-CV-870-TS) of Court, and THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, Defendants-Appellees. prejudice his pro se civil action against the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and Clerk of the Court Elisabeth A.

Vernon Gilstrap, II v. Circle K Corporation , 937 F.2d 616 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 9, 1991. Before LOGAN, SEYMOUR and TACHA, Circuit Judges. We have reviewed the record and read the relevant case law, and we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district court. * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

United States v. Arias-Santos , united-states-v-arias-santos (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Santos' appeal of the denial is currently pending with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. In the present case, Mr. Santos did not move the Tenth Circuit for permission to file his second § 2255 motion in the district court.

Fleet Resources v. Zwick , fleet-resources-v-zwick (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS In so doing, this court makes the following observation: contrary to Zwick’s assertions on appeal, in the Tenth Circuit a creditor need not prove that -2- The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is hereby AFFIRMED

Mark B. Zuckert v. Secretary of Health & Human Services , 937 F.2d 617 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 5, 1991. Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. Zuckert appeals the Secretary's denial of his application for supplemental security income which was affirmed by the district court for the District of We AFFIRM the district court for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Zuckert v.

Smith v. CIR , smith-v-cir (2005)

Smith’s motion and supplemental motion for recusal and disqualification of the entire United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, the United States District for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, several judges of the United States District -3- Courts of Colorado

Kevin Rutherford v. Gary Neet, Attorney General for the State of Colorado, District Court, Court of Appeals, and State Supreme Court , 149 F.3d 1191 (1998)

Kevin RUTHERFORD, Petitioner--Appellant,v.Gary NEET, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,District Court, Court of Appeals, and StateSupreme Court United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 19, 1998. Before ANDERSON, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Colorado Court of Appeals and the Colorado Supreme Court denied certiorari.

United States v. Montes-Lozano , united-states-v-montes-lozano (2000)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS be a fair reading, particularly given the court’s awareness of then-recent Tenth Circuit caselaw deciding that some of the same grounds relied upon it’s all pretty clear from the Tenth Circuit on backpackers.” II R. at 18.

Mendiola v. Ashcroft , mendiola-v-ashcroft (2006)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS M endiola moved for a change of venue from the Tenth Circuit to the Ninth Circuit, asserting that he had no nexus to Colorado and that allowing the case over final orders of removal now lies exclusively in a court of appeals pursuant to a petition for review.

Fuller v. Robinson , fuller-v-robinson (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Proceeding pro se, appellant Claudine Rene Fuller appeals the dismissal of the appeal she filed with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R.

In re: David Novak v. , in-re-david-novak-v (2004)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS David Novak, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of his appeal from a decision of the bankruptcy court for -2- cases before the Tenth Circuit and that the district court had a duty to clear up the confusion.

Bruner v. Champion, et.al. , bruner-v-champion-etal (1998)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and Tenth Circuit protocol, we assume that the district court denied petitioner a certificate of Petitioner filed his § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

Adkins v. Marten , adkins-v-marten (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT EBRAHIM Plaintiff Ebrahim Adkins appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil action against the district court judge who denied Plaintiff’s prior

United States v. Mendez , united-states-v-mendez (1997)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT He contends that the vacated panel decision in Cusumano indicated a willingness on the part of “several members” of the Tenth Circuit to hold that a

United States v. Nichols , 374 F.3d 959 (2004)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH The Supreme Court summarily reversed and remanded our decision for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker , 125 S. We requested that the parties file supplemental briefs on the applicability of Booker and subsequent Tenth Circuit cases.

Matrix Ski Corporation, a Texas Corporation v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, Tom Blake, Fred Crowley, George Madsen, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, and Others Yet Unnamed , 932 F.2d 975 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 8, 1991. Before JOHN P. MOORE, SETH and STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. We find no merit whatever in the questions presented for review, and AFFIRM the decision of the district court essentially for the reasons set forth in * This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit

United-States-V-Pearce , ca10 united-states-v-pearce (2000)

of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals involving issues relating to Sentencing Guidelines enhancements, constitute a change in However, he did not cite a single case from either the Tenth Circuit or the Supreme Court interpreting the Sentencing Guidelines in his opening brief

Parrin v. Helms , parrin-v-helms (1999)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS The judgment of the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Stephen H.

Sheriff John Lee v. United States , sheriff-john-lee-v-united-states (1997)

Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 1997 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER -3- Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico

United States v. Davis , united-states-v-davis (2008)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit He requested the Tenth Circuit pattern jury instruction for self-defense but the district court instead provided the jury with an instruction similar that the Court give just the general Tenth Circuit pattern instruction that I tendered.

Nunn v. Chapman , nunn-v-chapman (2011)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT RAYFEAL R The district court also correctly applied Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit precedent to conclude that Petitioner’s other claims failed on the merits.

United States v. Mora , united-states-v-mora (2009)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 4, Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, We, in turn, remand this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico with instructions to reconsider the sentence in light

United States v. Cox , united-states-v-cox (2005)

of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Cox acknowledges that, because of the panel ruling in Williams , “he cannot prevail on this issue at the Tenth Circuit panel level, but will ask for -2- The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is therefore

Olayiwola Ogunbiyi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, (United States of America) , 933 F.2d 1019 (1991)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 28, 1991. Before LOGAN and EBEL, Circuit Judges, and COOK,* Chief Judge. Dale Cook, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, sitting by designation ** This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing

Smolen v. Hatley , smolen-v-hatley (1999)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Byron White United Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 1999 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Hatley’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order, see Smolen v.

Carl Gene Hacker v. James L. Saffle, Warden, Robert H. Henry, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma , 936 F.2d 583 (1991)

Henry, Attorney Generalof the State of Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6042. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Hacker, a prisoner in the custody of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, appeals the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Western , but also because of a delay incurred when the appellate court remanded the appeal to the trial court for an additional evidentiary hearing.