Navigation



10000 search results for query


All

Law v. Law , law-v-law (2015)

Law, Appellant, vs. Benjamin F. In October 2010, after nearly twenty seven years of marriage, Ruth and Benjamin Law separated and Ruth moved out of the marital home. or the establishment of new law, as it applied to the material facts, with a reasonable expectation of success

Law v. Law , law-v-law (2008)

his ex-wife, Brenda Law, in state court. Tennessee law applies in this diversity action. Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). “Mere initiation of a law suit, though accompanied by a malicious ulterior motive, is not abuse of process.” Id.

Law v. Law , 753 A.2d 443 (2000)

LAW and Gary W. Law, Trustees of the Virginia M. Law Trust, Defendants-Below, Appellants, v. William A. LAW, III, Reed A. Law, Annette L. Law annually. NOTES [1] Law v. Law, Del. Ch., C.A. No. 14352, 1999 WL 126997 (Feb. 24, 1999) (Mem.Op.). [2] Law v. Law, Del. Ch., C.A.

Law v. Law , 738 So. 2d 522 (1999)

LAW, Appellant, v. Robert R. LAW, Barbara Law, Kimberly Pero and Teresa Fitzsimmons, Appellees. No. 98-2416. Appellant is the former wife of appellee Robert Law and has a judgment against him for support payments. A contract for sale, however, does not as a matter of law end homestead status.

Law v. Law , 922 F. Supp. 1106 (1996)

LAW, Conservator of the Estates of Jonathan W. Law and Melissa Beth Law, infants, Plaintiff, v. Roger D. LAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Clayton G. Law, deceased, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:94cv412. The memoranda of law to be filed as heretofore ordered shall include discussion of this issue.

Law v. Law , 455 S.W.2d 854 (1970)

LAW, Appellant, v. Patricia Rich LAW, Appellee. No. 5-5257. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 1, 1970. Law and the three other children to appellee Patricia Rich Law, dismissed appellant's cross-complaint and awarded appellee a divorce upon her complaint For the support and maintenance of Donna Law, Jennifer Law, and Jefrey Law, $100.00 per month for each. C.

Law v. Cheek-Law , 258 Ga. 190 (1988)

258 Ga. 190 (1988) 366 S.E.2d 680 LAW v. CHEEK-LAW. 45219. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided April 7, 1988.

Rebecca Law v. Patrick Law , 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4440 (1996)

First: The decision must establish a new principle of law, either by overturning clear past precedent or by deciding an issue of first impression. . . The Soden court, in applying the above standards to the Pinsky decision and its potential impact upon Connecticut's law regarding attachments, stated that

Sec. 110. "General law," "local law" and "special law" defined. , 1757bea3376e18b6 (2020)

"General law," "local law" and "special law" defined. a local law. A local law is a law which is not a general law or a special or private law.

409.040 Federal law supersedes state law. , 409.040 (2020)

409.040 Federal law supersedes state law. (1) To the extent that there is any conflict between chapter 319, Oregon Laws 1971, and any federal law referred to or to be administered under chapter 319, Oregon Laws 1971, the federal law in effect on June 8, 1971, is controlling

683.22 Law Day and Law Week. — , 683.22 (2020)

683.22 Law Day and Law Week. — (1) May 1 of each year is designated as "Law Day," and the week starting with the Sunday preceding May 1 is proclaimed "Law Week" in Florida. If May 1 falls on a Sunday, Law Week begins on that day.

Law v. LAW CO. BLDG. ASSOCIATES , 210 P.3d 676 (2009)

LAW COMPANY BUILDING ASSOCIATES, a Kansas Limited Partnership, and the Law Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, Appellees. No. 100,497. (Law Co.) See Law Company Building Assoc. v. Law, No. 67,545, unpublished opinion filed April 2, 1993.

LAW BOOK , 990f4c11bd496f02 (2020)

(e) Any person penalized by the board under this chapter may appeal any order of the board in the manner provided by law. The rules and regulations adopted under this subsection shall have the force and effect of law. for failing to comply with any applicable law or rule. 17-26-321.

§ 9.5-316 FAM. LAW. Law enforcement officer. , 9.5-316 FAM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Law enforcement officer. At the request of the Attorney General acting under § 9.5-315 of this subtitle, a law enforcement officer may take any lawful action reasonably necessary

§ 4A-507 COM. LAW. Choice of law. , 4A-507 COM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Choice of law. system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system. The law of a jurisdiction selected pursuant to this subsection may govern, whether or not that law bears a reasonable relation to the matter in issue.

In Re Tremont Securities Law, State Law , 703 F. Supp. 2d 362 (2010)

Supp. 2d 362 (2010) In re TREMONT SECURITIES LAW, STATE LAW AND INSURANCE LITIGATION. Gresham, Law Office, Atlanta, GA, David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Peter A. Lagorio, Peter A. Lagorio, Law Office, Boston, MA, Claude F. Law. § 352-c(1).

Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law Firm , 212 Ariz. 244 (2006)

John and Jane Doe Partners A-D, 155 Ariz. 519, 521, 747 P.2d 1218, 1220 (1987) (stating implied in law contracts are "obligations `created by the law without Offices and the Keenan Law Firm. L.J. 121, 130 (2003); Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 45(2)(d) (2000).

Mobley Law Firm v. Lisle Law Firm , 120 S.W.3d 537 (2003)

120 S.W.3d 537 (2003) MOBLEY LAW FIRM, P.A. v. LISLE LAW FIRM, P.A. No. 03-159. Supreme Court of Arkansas. . *538 Mobley Law Firm, P.A., by: Jeff Mobley, Russellville, for appellant. Lisle Law Firm, P.A., by: Chris Lisle, Springdale, for appellee. Attorney Jeff Mobley of Mobley Law Firm, P.A. appeals a trial court's order finding that Mr.

SOTO-LAW v. LAW [1st Dept 2000] , dec4ea90692209ff (2000)

SOTO-LAW v. LAW [1st Dept 2000] SOTO-LAW v. LAW [AND ANOTHER ACTION].Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Sec. 110. "General law," "local law" and "special or private law"defined. , 8df53876e051778a (2020)

"General law," "local law" and "special or private law"defined. A general law within the meaning of this article is a law which applies to the whole state; a local law is a law which applies to any political subdivision or subdivisions of the state less than the whole; a special or private law within the meaning of this article is one which applies to an individual, association

§ 8-110 COM. LAW. Applicability; choice of law. , 8-110 COM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Applicability; choice of law. , the law of another jurisdiction specified by the issuer (2) An issuer organized under the law of this State may specify the law of another jurisdiction as the law governing the matters specified in subsection

22 NYCRR 1032.1. Law guardian office; law guardiandirector. , 22 NYCRR 1032.1 (2020)

Law guardian office; law guardiandirector. (b) The function of the law guardian office shall be to provide continuing administrative direction to the law guardian program in the Fourth Judicial The duties of the law guardian director shall include but not be limited to the following: (1) to administer the law guardian program office in accordance

Eichholz Law Firm v. Tate Law Group, LLC , 310 Ga. App. 848 (2011)

App. 848 The EICHHOLZ LAW FIRM, P.C. et al. v. TATE LAW GROUP, LLC et al. No. A11A0704. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 13, 2011. The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. (the Eichholz firm) and Weinstock & Scavo, P.C. Eichholz and his firm alone, or they could be represented by Tate Law Group. . . .

LAW v. LAW, 186 W. Va. 376 (1991) , 186 W. Va. 376 (1991)

LAW v. LAW, 186 W. Va. 376 (1991) 412 S.E.2d 777 Helen Patricia LAW, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Joe Randall LAW DefendantBelow, Appellee. Law v. Law, 177 W. Va. 766, 768, 356 S.E.2d 637, 639 (1987). Law, 177 W. Va. at 768, 356 S.E.2d at 639.

LAW v. LAW, 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989) , 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989)

LAW v. LAW, 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989) 384 S.E.2d 891 LAW v. LAW. A89A0301.Court of Appeals of Georgia. Law. Both Mary Law and Helen Law filed claims to receive the FEGLI proceeds. Law.

LAW v. CHEEK-LAW, 258 Ga. 190 (1988) , 258 Ga. 190 (1988)

LAW v. CHEEK-LAW, 258 Ga. 190 (1988) 366 S.E.2d 680 LAW v. CHEEK-LAW. 45219.Supreme Court of Georgia.

LAW v. LAW, 177 W. Va. 766 (1987) , 177 W. Va. 766 (1987)

LAW v. LAW, 177 W. Va. 766 (1987) 356 S.E.2d 637 Helen Patricia LAW v. Joe Randall LAW. No. 17143.Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. and child support payable to her by her former husband, Joe Randall Law. The trial court made no finding of fault, but granted the appellant custody of the parties' two teenage children, Kimberly Ann Law and Scott Randall Law

LAW v. LAW, 118 App. Div. 908 (1907) , 118 App. Div. 908 (1907)

LAW v. LAW, 118 App. Div. 908 (1907) William W. Law v. Elizabeth Law.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

LAW v. LAW, 117 App. Div. 911 (1907) , 117 App. Div. 911 (1907)

LAW v. LAW, 117 App. Div. 911 (1907) William Law v. Elizabeth Law and Others.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

IC 22-12-1-13 "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law,.... , 22-12-1-13 (2020)

IC 22-12-1-13 "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law,.... "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law, or other law safeguarding life or property from the hazards of fire or explosion.

IC 22-12-1-3 "Building law" means any equipment law or other law.... , 22-12-1-3 (2020)

IC 22-12-1-3 "Building law" means any equipment law or other law.... "Building law" means any equipment law or other law governing any of the following: (1) Fabrication of an industrialized building system or mobile structure

11002.6.1 State Law , 36adf5eafc7ef06d (2020)

11002.6.1 State Law The State Law governing the Child Care Subsidy Program is Title 31, Part I, Chapter 3, Subchapter VI, Delaware Code — Section The intent and purposes of this subchapter of the State Law are to: A. provide child day care facilities available within this state so as to provide

67.025 Governing law. , 67.025 (2020)

67.025 Governing law. partners and between the partners and the partnership and the liability of the partners for obligations of the partnership are governed by: (a) The law under paragraph (a) of this subsection, the law of the state in which the partnership has its principal office from which the partnership conducts its

190.014 Federal Law , 857b482673033c54 (2020)

190.014 Federal Law 12-1-05 If any provision of these policies and procedures are found to conflict with current federal law, including promulgated federal regulations, the federal law shall override that provision.

Early Incentive Law , 22649c63c27083ad (2020)

Early Incentive Law (Act 808 of 1987) DEFINITION An employee of a state agency who, on April 8, 1987, was an active member of the Teacher Retirement System and qualified to retire before January 1, 1988, under the Early Retirement Incentive Law of 1987 (Act 187 of 1987), could elect to become a member

537.1103 Law applicable. , 537.1103 (2020)

537.1103 Law applicable. Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this chapter, the uniform commercial code as provided in chapter 554 and the principles of law and equity , including the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy or

489.801 Governing law. , 489.801 (2020)

489.801 Governing law. 1. The law of the state or other jurisdiction under which a foreign limited liability company is formed governs all of the following: a. which the company is formed and the law of this state. 3.

489.106 Governing law. , 489.106 (2020)

489.106 Governing law. The law of this state governs all of the following: 1. The internal affairs of a limited liability company. 2.

488.106 Governing law. , 488.106 (2020)

488.106 Governing law. The law of this state governs relations among the partners of a limited partnership and between the partners and the limited partnership and the liability

602.5203 Law clerks. , 602.5203 (2020)

602.5203 Law clerks. The court of appeals may employ attorneys or graduates of a reputable law school to act as legal assistants to the court. 83 Acts, ch 186, § 6203, 10201

552.683 Applicable law. , 552.683 (2020)

552.683 Applicable law. Sec. 13. (1) Except as otherwise provided by subsection (2), the law of this state shall apply in all actions and proceedings concerning the entry, enforcement (2) The law of the jurisdiction that issued the support order shall govern all of the following: (a) The interpretation of the support order entered

324.1804 Applicable law. , 324.1804 (2020)

324.1804 Applicable law. Sec. 1804. The law to be applied in an action or other proceeding brought pursuant to this part, including what constitutes "pollution," is the law of this state, excluding choice of law rules.

700.2401 Applicable law , 700.2401 (2020)

700.2401 Applicable law Sec. 2401. This part applies to the estate of a decedent who dies domiciled in this state. For a decedent who dies domiciled outside of this state, rights to homestead allowance, family allowance, and exempt property are governed by the law of

700.7107 Governing law. , 700.7107 (2020)

700.7107 Governing law. Sec. 7107. The meaning and effect of the terms of a trust are determined by the following: (a) The law of the jurisdiction designated in the terms of the trust unless (b) In the absence of a controlling designation in the terms of the trust, the law of the jurisdiction having the most significant relationship to the

Opinion

Law v. Law , law-v-law (2015)

Law, Appellant, vs. Benjamin F. In October 2010, after nearly twenty seven years of marriage, Ruth and Benjamin Law separated and Ruth moved out of the marital home. or the establishment of new law, as it applied to the material facts, with a reasonable expectation of success

Law v. Law , law-v-law (2008)

his ex-wife, Brenda Law, in state court. Tennessee law applies in this diversity action. Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). “Mere initiation of a law suit, though accompanied by a malicious ulterior motive, is not abuse of process.” Id.

Law v. Law , 753 A.2d 443 (2000)

LAW and Gary W. Law, Trustees of the Virginia M. Law Trust, Defendants-Below, Appellants, v. William A. LAW, III, Reed A. Law, Annette L. Law annually. NOTES [1] Law v. Law, Del. Ch., C.A. No. 14352, 1999 WL 126997 (Feb. 24, 1999) (Mem.Op.). [2] Law v. Law, Del. Ch., C.A.

Law v. Law , 738 So. 2d 522 (1999)

LAW, Appellant, v. Robert R. LAW, Barbara Law, Kimberly Pero and Teresa Fitzsimmons, Appellees. No. 98-2416. Appellant is the former wife of appellee Robert Law and has a judgment against him for support payments. A contract for sale, however, does not as a matter of law end homestead status.

Law v. Law , 922 F. Supp. 1106 (1996)

LAW, Conservator of the Estates of Jonathan W. Law and Melissa Beth Law, infants, Plaintiff, v. Roger D. LAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Clayton G. Law, deceased, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:94cv412. The memoranda of law to be filed as heretofore ordered shall include discussion of this issue.

Law v. Law , 455 S.W.2d 854 (1970)

LAW, Appellant, v. Patricia Rich LAW, Appellee. No. 5-5257. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 1, 1970. Law and the three other children to appellee Patricia Rich Law, dismissed appellant's cross-complaint and awarded appellee a divorce upon her complaint For the support and maintenance of Donna Law, Jennifer Law, and Jefrey Law, $100.00 per month for each. C.

Law v. Cheek-Law , 258 Ga. 190 (1988)

258 Ga. 190 (1988) 366 S.E.2d 680 LAW v. CHEEK-LAW. 45219. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided April 7, 1988.

Rebecca Law v. Patrick Law , 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4440 (1996)

First: The decision must establish a new principle of law, either by overturning clear past precedent or by deciding an issue of first impression. . . The Soden court, in applying the above standards to the Pinsky decision and its potential impact upon Connecticut's law regarding attachments, stated that

Law v. LAW CO. BLDG. ASSOCIATES , 210 P.3d 676 (2009)

LAW COMPANY BUILDING ASSOCIATES, a Kansas Limited Partnership, and the Law Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, Appellees. No. 100,497. (Law Co.) See Law Company Building Assoc. v. Law, No. 67,545, unpublished opinion filed April 2, 1993.

In Re Tremont Securities Law, State Law , 703 F. Supp. 2d 362 (2010)

Supp. 2d 362 (2010) In re TREMONT SECURITIES LAW, STATE LAW AND INSURANCE LITIGATION. Gresham, Law Office, Atlanta, GA, David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Peter A. Lagorio, Peter A. Lagorio, Law Office, Boston, MA, Claude F. Law. § 352-c(1).

Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law Firm , 212 Ariz. 244 (2006)

John and Jane Doe Partners A-D, 155 Ariz. 519, 521, 747 P.2d 1218, 1220 (1987) (stating implied in law contracts are "obligations `created by the law without Offices and the Keenan Law Firm. L.J. 121, 130 (2003); Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 45(2)(d) (2000).

Mobley Law Firm v. Lisle Law Firm , 120 S.W.3d 537 (2003)

120 S.W.3d 537 (2003) MOBLEY LAW FIRM, P.A. v. LISLE LAW FIRM, P.A. No. 03-159. Supreme Court of Arkansas. . *538 Mobley Law Firm, P.A., by: Jeff Mobley, Russellville, for appellant. Lisle Law Firm, P.A., by: Chris Lisle, Springdale, for appellee. Attorney Jeff Mobley of Mobley Law Firm, P.A. appeals a trial court's order finding that Mr.

SOTO-LAW v. LAW [1st Dept 2000] , dec4ea90692209ff (2000)

SOTO-LAW v. LAW [1st Dept 2000] SOTO-LAW v. LAW [AND ANOTHER ACTION].Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Eichholz Law Firm v. Tate Law Group, LLC , 310 Ga. App. 848 (2011)

App. 848 The EICHHOLZ LAW FIRM, P.C. et al. v. TATE LAW GROUP, LLC et al. No. A11A0704. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 13, 2011. The Eichholz Law Firm, P.C. (the Eichholz firm) and Weinstock & Scavo, P.C. Eichholz and his firm alone, or they could be represented by Tate Law Group. . . .

LAW v. LAW, 186 W. Va. 376 (1991) , 186 W. Va. 376 (1991)

LAW v. LAW, 186 W. Va. 376 (1991) 412 S.E.2d 777 Helen Patricia LAW, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Joe Randall LAW DefendantBelow, Appellee. Law v. Law, 177 W. Va. 766, 768, 356 S.E.2d 637, 639 (1987). Law, 177 W. Va. at 768, 356 S.E.2d at 639.

LAW v. LAW, 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989) , 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989)

LAW v. LAW, 192 Ga. App. 367 (1989) 384 S.E.2d 891 LAW v. LAW. A89A0301.Court of Appeals of Georgia. Law. Both Mary Law and Helen Law filed claims to receive the FEGLI proceeds. Law.

LAW v. CHEEK-LAW, 258 Ga. 190 (1988) , 258 Ga. 190 (1988)

LAW v. CHEEK-LAW, 258 Ga. 190 (1988) 366 S.E.2d 680 LAW v. CHEEK-LAW. 45219.Supreme Court of Georgia.

LAW v. LAW, 177 W. Va. 766 (1987) , 177 W. Va. 766 (1987)

LAW v. LAW, 177 W. Va. 766 (1987) 356 S.E.2d 637 Helen Patricia LAW v. Joe Randall LAW. No. 17143.Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. and child support payable to her by her former husband, Joe Randall Law. The trial court made no finding of fault, but granted the appellant custody of the parties' two teenage children, Kimberly Ann Law and Scott Randall Law

LAW v. LAW, 118 App. Div. 908 (1907) , 118 App. Div. 908 (1907)

LAW v. LAW, 118 App. Div. 908 (1907) William W. Law v. Elizabeth Law.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

LAW v. LAW, 117 App. Div. 911 (1907) , 117 App. Div. 911 (1907)

LAW v. LAW, 117 App. Div. 911 (1907) William Law v. Elizabeth Law and Others.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Statute

Sec. 110. "General law," "local law" and "special law" defined. , 1757bea3376e18b6 (2020)

"General law," "local law" and "special law" defined. a local law. A local law is a law which is not a general law or a special or private law.

409.040 Federal law supersedes state law. , 409.040 (2020)

409.040 Federal law supersedes state law. (1) To the extent that there is any conflict between chapter 319, Oregon Laws 1971, and any federal law referred to or to be administered under chapter 319, Oregon Laws 1971, the federal law in effect on June 8, 1971, is controlling

683.22 Law Day and Law Week. — , 683.22 (2020)

683.22 Law Day and Law Week. — (1) May 1 of each year is designated as "Law Day," and the week starting with the Sunday preceding May 1 is proclaimed "Law Week" in Florida. If May 1 falls on a Sunday, Law Week begins on that day.

§ 9.5-316 FAM. LAW. Law enforcement officer. , 9.5-316 FAM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Law enforcement officer. At the request of the Attorney General acting under § 9.5-315 of this subtitle, a law enforcement officer may take any lawful action reasonably necessary

§ 4A-507 COM. LAW. Choice of law. , 4A-507 COM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Choice of law. system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system. The law of a jurisdiction selected pursuant to this subsection may govern, whether or not that law bears a reasonable relation to the matter in issue.

Sec. 110. "General law," "local law" and "special or private law"defined. , 8df53876e051778a (2020)

"General law," "local law" and "special or private law"defined. A general law within the meaning of this article is a law which applies to the whole state; a local law is a law which applies to any political subdivision or subdivisions of the state less than the whole; a special or private law within the meaning of this article is one which applies to an individual, association

§ 8-110 COM. LAW. Applicability; choice of law. , 8-110 COM. LAW. (2020)

LAW. Applicability; choice of law. , the law of another jurisdiction specified by the issuer (2) An issuer organized under the law of this State may specify the law of another jurisdiction as the law governing the matters specified in subsection

IC 22-12-1-13 "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law,.... , 22-12-1-13 (2020)

IC 22-12-1-13 "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law,.... "Fire safety law" means any building law, equipment law, or other law safeguarding life or property from the hazards of fire or explosion.

IC 22-12-1-3 "Building law" means any equipment law or other law.... , 22-12-1-3 (2020)

IC 22-12-1-3 "Building law" means any equipment law or other law.... "Building law" means any equipment law or other law governing any of the following: (1) Fabrication of an industrialized building system or mobile structure

67.025 Governing law. , 67.025 (2020)

67.025 Governing law. partners and between the partners and the partnership and the liability of the partners for obligations of the partnership are governed by: (a) The law under paragraph (a) of this subsection, the law of the state in which the partnership has its principal office from which the partnership conducts its

537.1103 Law applicable. , 537.1103 (2020)

537.1103 Law applicable. Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this chapter, the uniform commercial code as provided in chapter 554 and the principles of law and equity , including the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy or

489.801 Governing law. , 489.801 (2020)

489.801 Governing law. 1. The law of the state or other jurisdiction under which a foreign limited liability company is formed governs all of the following: a. which the company is formed and the law of this state. 3.

489.106 Governing law. , 489.106 (2020)

489.106 Governing law. The law of this state governs all of the following: 1. The internal affairs of a limited liability company. 2.

488.106 Governing law. , 488.106 (2020)

488.106 Governing law. The law of this state governs relations among the partners of a limited partnership and between the partners and the limited partnership and the liability

602.5203 Law clerks. , 602.5203 (2020)

602.5203 Law clerks. The court of appeals may employ attorneys or graduates of a reputable law school to act as legal assistants to the court. 83 Acts, ch 186, § 6203, 10201

552.683 Applicable law. , 552.683 (2020)

552.683 Applicable law. Sec. 13. (1) Except as otherwise provided by subsection (2), the law of this state shall apply in all actions and proceedings concerning the entry, enforcement (2) The law of the jurisdiction that issued the support order shall govern all of the following: (a) The interpretation of the support order entered

324.1804 Applicable law. , 324.1804 (2020)

324.1804 Applicable law. Sec. 1804. The law to be applied in an action or other proceeding brought pursuant to this part, including what constitutes "pollution," is the law of this state, excluding choice of law rules.

700.2401 Applicable law , 700.2401 (2020)

700.2401 Applicable law Sec. 2401. This part applies to the estate of a decedent who dies domiciled in this state. For a decedent who dies domiciled outside of this state, rights to homestead allowance, family allowance, and exempt property are governed by the law of

700.7107 Governing law. , 700.7107 (2020)

700.7107 Governing law. Sec. 7107. The meaning and effect of the terms of a trust are determined by the following: (a) The law of the jurisdiction designated in the terms of the trust unless (b) In the absence of a controlling designation in the terms of the trust, the law of the jurisdiction having the most significant relationship to the