Clear

10000 search results for query


Citation: 682 F. Supp. 2d 947 | Docket No.: 4:09CV00312 SWW
Status: Published | Citing: 25
Summary: 682 F. Supp. [1] Defendants seek dismissal of the complaint asserting that Hardeman failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to most of his claims and fails to state a claim for relief under Title VII as to the other claims. [2]Doe v. Northwest Bank Minn., N.A., 107 F.3d 1297, 1303-04 (8th Cir.1997). The complaint should be reviewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, McMorrow v. Little, 109 F.3d 432, 434 (8th Cir.1997), and should not be dismissed if there are pled "......read more.


Citation: 361 F. Supp. 829 | Docket No.: PB-73-C-47
Status: Published | Citing: 25
Summary: 361 F. Supp. The only substantial federal question raised by the petition is whether petitioner was denied due process of law when the Circuit Court failed to adjudicate the question of whether petitioner was mentally competent to stand trial in early February 1971. In the course of the trial itself no question was raised as to petitioner's mental competency to be on trial or as to his sanity or insanity at the time of the commission of the alleged offense. While the Court, counsel, and petition......read more.


Citation: 765 F. Supp. 510 | Docket No.: Civ. No. LR-C-89-1021
Status: Published | Citing: 7
Summary: 765 F. Supp. Plaintiff filed an application for wife's insurance benefits on September 24, 1987, on the record of Pete Acuna (or wage earner), who became entitled to disability insurance benefits as of June, 1982, due to Parkinson's disease.The Social Security Administration contacted the wage earner, who subsequently submitted a statement which says in relevant part that he had never obtained a divorce from his wife Andy Savala, that he married plaintiff in Houston, but that he thinks Alice got......read more.


Citation: 703 F. Supp. 1381 | Docket No.: PB-C-84-216
Status: Published | Citing: 8
Summary: 703 F. Supp. 1381 (1988) Leydel WILLIS, Plaintiff, v. WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT; Charles Knight, Individually and as Superintendent of the Watson Chapel School District; and C.C. Stuart, Individually and as Principal of the Watson Chapel Senior High School, Defendants. Jack A. McNulty, Pine Bluff, Ark., and Dan F. Bufford, Little Rock, Ark., for defendants. Plaintiff, a teacher in the Watson Chapel School District, filed her initial complaint and subsequent amended complaints alleging discri......read more.


Citation: 698 F. Supp. 169 | Docket No.: PB-C-88-485
Status: Published | Citing: 13
Summary: 698 F. Supp. Voors v. National Women's Health Organization, Inc., 611 F. Supp. 1968); Estate of Fitzpatrick v. Brehm, 580 F. Supp.


Citation: 21 F. Supp. 2d 941 | Docket No.: LR-C-97-892
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 21 F. Supp. Russell v. Secretary of H.E.W., 540 F.2d 353, 355 (8th Cir.1976); Timmerman v. Weinberger, 510 F.2d 439, 442 (8th Cir.1975); Easttam v. Secretary of H.E.W., 364 F.2d 509, 511 (8th Cir.1966). McMillian v. Schweiker, supra, 697 F.2d at 222; Weber v. Harris, 640 F.2d 176, 178 (8th Cir.1981); Dunlap v. Harris, 649 F.2d 637, 641 (8th Cir.1981); Janka v. Secretary of H.E.W., 589 F.2d 365, 367-68 (8th Cir.1978).


Citation: 849 F. Supp. 673 | Docket No.: LR-C-90-155
Status: Published | Citing: 4
Summary: 849 F. Supp. 673 (1993) Ulysses T. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE OAKLEY, INC., Defendant. In this case the plaintiff, Ulysses T. Carter, complains that he was illegally discharged from his job at Bruce Oakley, Inc., ("Oakley") for refusing to cut the beard he wore for religious reasons. He argues that Oakley's enforcement of its "no beard" policy conflicted with certain Jewish religious beliefs he holds and violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Former defendant Rat......read more.


Citation: 628 F. Supp. 2d 984 | Docket No.: 5:06cv0037 SWW
Status: Published | Citing: 42
Summary: 628 F. Supp. This is a case of alleged employment discrimination in which plaintiff Mary Bearden, a former employee of defendant International Paper Company ("IC"), asserts claims of sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., pay discrimination in violation of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 ("EPA"), 29 U.S.C. § 206......read more.


Citation: 420 F. Supp. 2d 980 | Docket No.: 1:05CV00046 JLH
Status: Published | Citing: 21
Summary: 420 F. Supp. 2d 980 (2006) Chris SENSABAUGH d/b/a Sensabaugh Insurance Agency, Inc., Plaintiff v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE; Truck Insurance Exchange; Fire Insurance Exchange; Mid-Century Insurance Company; Farmers New World Life Insurance Company; and Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., Defendants. Chris Sensabaugh brought this action for breach of contract in the Circuit Court of Independence County to recover money due under an agent appointment agreement from the defendants Farmers Insurance E......read more.


Citation: 564 F. Supp. 2d 863 | Docket No.: 4:06cv00944 BSM
Status: Published | Citing: 19
Summary: (2008) Washington Lamont JONES, et al., Plaintiffs v. FORREST CITY GROCERY INC., et al., Defendants. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Forrest City Grocery (FCG) is a grocery wholesaler located in Forrest City, Arkansas, that delivers bulk goods to retailers in Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Missouri. The nine original plaintiffs are: Patrick Spearman, Kip Rucker, Will Green, Sidney Parchman, Charles Rogers, Washington Lamont Jones, William Ware, Michael Ward, and Lamar Cole. On May 21, 2008, upon ......read more.


Citation: 447 F. Supp. 534 | Docket No.: LR-75-CR-242 and LR-76-CR-18
Status: Published | Citing: 17
Summary: 447 F. Supp. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Harry HASTINGS, Sr., Toney Lynn Givens and Gary Wayne Smith, Defendants. Count I charges that Harry Hastings, Sr., Toney Givens and Gary Smith conspired to violate 18 U.S.C. § 659 by stealing, receiving, and possessing a truckload of tires which constituted an interstate shipment of freight, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, the federal conspiracy statute. United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (1975). United States v. Greater Blouse Ski......read more.


Citation: 431 F. Supp. 1122 | Docket No.: LR-74-C-171
Status: Published | Citing: 31
Summary: 431 F. Supp. 1122 (1977) W. R. ALSOBROOK and Wells F. Alsobrook, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. This action is brought by taxpayers W. R. Alsobrook and Wells F. Alsobrook seeking refunds of income taxes previously assessed and paid. The Plaintiff contends he is entitled to deductions against ordinary income for ordinary and necessary business expenses pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 162; or for business losses pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 165; or for business bad debts pursuant to 26 U.S......read more.


Citation: 999 F. Supp. 1256 | Docket No.: PB-C-95-394
Status: Published | Citing: 5
Summary: 999 F. Supp. Petitioner strongly asserts, among other claims for relief, that she is actually innocent of the charge of selling to an undercover police officer one rock of cocaine for which she was convicted. BACKGROUND On April 2, 1991, Thomas Washington, an officer associated with the Narcotics Division of the North Little Rock Police Department, approached a female in the area of 1800 East Washington at approximately 3:00 p. m.[1] Officer Washington asked the female if she had anything to sel......read more.


Citation: 744 F. Supp. 898 | Docket No.: B-C-81-120
Status: Published | Citing: 1
Summary: 744 F. Supp. The Court's review of counsel's time sheets persuaded the Court that counsel's times and charges for actual work on the case, i.e., research, drafting, conferences, etc., were reasonable, but that the bills were inflated with a large number of mechanically applied charges which could not be reasonably justified. 12/16/81—.25 hours for reviewing a file stamped copy of plaintiff's complaint. Unless the Court has overlooked an order by Judge Ginger requiring an hour of reading, counsel......read more.


Citation: 266 F. Supp. 2d 876 | Docket No.: 1-02-CV00037-WRW
Status: Published | Citing: 31
Summary: 266 F. Supp. 2d 876 (2003) ARKANSAS NATURE ALLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; Colonel Benjamin Butler, District Engineer, Little Rock District, Corps of Engineers, Defendants. *879 E. Fletcher Jackson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, James W. Cullum, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock, AR, for Department of Defense, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Benjamin Butler, Colonel, District Engineer, Little Rock District Corps of Engin......read more.


Citation: 492 F. Supp. 956 | Docket No.: LR-C-80-257
Status: Published | Citing: 9
Summary: 492 F. Supp. This case arises out of the proposed construction of a reservoir designed to provide the City of Conway, Arkansas with an adequate water supply. I. FACTS In 1974 Congress authorized the construction of a new water supply facility for the City of Conway in Faulkner County, Arkansas. Accordingly Congress ordered "the alteration at Federal Expense of the municipal water supply facilities of the City of Conway, Arkansas, by the construction of water supply impoundment facilities at a lo......read more.


Citation: 291 F. Supp. 2d 858 | Docket No.: 4:00CR00187 GH
Status: Published | Citing: 3
Summary: 291 F. Supp. Currently pending before the Court is defendant Hively's motion to dismiss the remaining charges against him based upon his contention that — before the Honorable James M. Moody recused in this matter — Judge Moody had already ruled on defendant's previously filed motion for judgment of acquittal and that such ruling likely acquitted him of some or all of the 16 counts remaining in the case.


Citation: 362 F. Supp. 730 | Docket No.: LR-68-C-151
Status: Published | Citing: 6
Summary: 362 F. Supp. 730 (1973) Robert J. DAVIS et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants. In that case, which involved the public schools of Fort Worth, Texas, the Court of Appeals said (464 F.2d at 869): "We believe, however, that because of the peculiarities of the kindergarten program, the limited nature of its operations, and the tender age and special needs of its students, its elimination from the over-all student assignment plan ......read more.


Citation: 439 F. Supp. 2d 903 | Docket No.: 4:06CR00053 JLH
Status: Published | Citing: 23
Summary: 439 F. Supp. Cf. United States v. Field, 62 F.3d 246, 248-49 (8th Cir.1995). United States v. Riley, 78 F.3d 367, 370 (8th Cir. See also United States v. Razmilovic, 419 F.3d 134, 137 (2d Cir.2005) (noting that the Supreme Court has dubbed pretrial restraint as a "`nuclear weapon' of the law"); United States v. Ripinsky, 20 F.3d 359, 363 n. 5 (9th Cir.1994) ("Given the partly punitive nature of § 853, we must be cautious about construing § 853 liberally."). In United States v. Hawkey, 148 F.3d 9......read more.


Citation: 566 F. Supp. 846 | Docket No.: LR-C-82-509
Status: Published | Citing: 28
Summary: 566 F. Supp. Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union and Its Affiliated Local No. 1121, 625 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir.1980). Steamship Co., 134 F. Supp. 2d 683 (1977); Hutson v. Fehr Bros., Inc., 584 F.2d 833 (8th Cir.1978); and Amstar Corp. v. S.S. Alexandros, 457 F. Supp. Lomanco and MoPac contend that when a party files a cross-claim (which, under F.R.C.P., Rule 13(g), is always permissive, Augustin v. Mughel, 521 F.2d 1215 (8th Cir.1975)), it thereby invokes the jurisdict......read more.